<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windham News : voting</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: voting</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>‘No’ to school budget in Windham</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2009/03/11/_1820_No_1920_-to-school-budget-in-Windham.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:13055</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/13055.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=13055</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font face="NimbusSanL-BoldCond" size="1"&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;BY &lt;a href="mailto:perkins.derrick@gmail.com"&gt;DERRICK PERKINS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;Voters came down heavily against increased spending at the ballots, rejecting a proposed $1.2 million track and field for the new high school and a $5 million bond to conserve farmland. The school district&amp;rsquo;s operating budget was also defeated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Needing a 60 percent majority to pass, the track and field bond was soundly defeated, 1,654 to 1,538. Without the facility, the roughly 50 students in the incoming freshmen and sophomore classes who expressed interest in pursuing a track and field program will have to practice elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The defeat of the district&amp;rsquo;s $40.5 million operating budget at the polls leaves school officials with $656,422 less than anticipated. Officials will be instead operating under the district&amp;rsquo;s $39.8 million default budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Voters also rejected an $800,000 proposal to hire architects and engineers to design school renovation and construction projects for the district&amp;rsquo;s Golden Brook Elementary School and Center School.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the town ballot, voters overwhelmingly came down against a $5 million bond intendend to purchase and preserve the town&amp;rsquo;s remaining farm and agricultural land.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two zoning amendments intended to increase commercial development in town, according to supporters, also failed to garner enough support from voters. Plans to rezone the stateowned land near the golf course on Range Road failed before voters while an effort to rezone Clarke Farm North was soundly defeated, 1,473 to 1,552.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A protest petition filed by opponents before town meeting day had required the Clarke Farm North proposal to receive a super majority in order to pass.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incumbent Selectman Dennis Senibaldi (1,634) lost his seat in a narrow race for one of two seats up for grab on the board to newcomer Ross McLeod (1,779). Fellow selectman Roger Hohenberger (1,820) won his bid for re-election and led the three candidates in votes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the School Board, longtime member Barbara Coish (1,162) failed to win re-election, losing to challengers Ed Gallagher (1,587) and Jeff Bostic (1,453).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another longtime incumbent, Town Clerk Joan Tuck (584) lost overwhelmingly to Nicole Merrill (2,230). Challenger Betty Dunn received 332 votes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13055" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/school+district/default.aspx">school district</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/track+and+field/default.aspx">track and field</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/budget/default.aspx">budget</category></item><item><title>Windham track and field bond to be top money item at session</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2009/02/04/Windham-track-and-field-bond-to-be-top-money-item-at-session.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:12681</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/12681.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=12681</wfw:commentRss><description>BY &lt;a href="mailto:perkins.derrick@gmail.com" target="_blank"&gt;DERRICK PERKINS&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the opening of the new
high school coming up fast, the
School Board is asking voters to
consider a bond
for the construction
of a $2.7
million track
and athletic
field at the Feb. 6
deliberative session
at 7 p.m. in the Golden Brook
School.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With $500,000 of that coming
from the interest earned on
the investment of bond proceeds,
taxpayers are being asked to raise
$2.2 million for the addition to
the new high school.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar $1.5 million bond
for the construction of a second
gymnasium at the high school
was cut by the School Board
last month. Voters rejected a
combined request for a second
gymnasium and track and field
on the ballot last year.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An $800,000 appropriation to
cover the architect and engineering
fees associated with completing
a building study for the district
is also up for discussion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district is also asking residents
to approve a $40.4 million
operating budget for the ensuing
year. The district&amp;rsquo;s default budget
- should the proposed budget
fail before voters in March &amp;ndash; is
$39.8 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12681" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/sports/default.aspx">sports</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/town+meeting/default.aspx">town meeting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/windham+high+school/default.aspx">windham high school</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/track/default.aspx">track</category></item><item><title>Windham voters consider warrant to allow credit card use</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2009/02/04/Windham-voters-consider-warrant-to-allow-credit-card-use.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:12680</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/12680.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=12680</wfw:commentRss><description>BY &lt;a href="mailto:perkins.derrick@gmail.com" target="_blank"&gt;DERRICK PERKINS&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Residents may
be able to pay their taxes and
other fees with plastic if a warrant
authorizing the town&amp;rsquo;s officials to
accept payment by credit card is
ratified at the Feb. 7 deliberative
session of Town Meeting at 9 a.m.
in the Golden Brook School.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If voters pass the warrant article
on to the ballot as is and it passes
in March, selectmen are authorized
to hold a public hearing to
determine which
specific types of
fees credit cards
could be used
to pay with and
whether to impose
any maximum
transaction limits. The board will
also have the go-ahead to negotiate
a processing agreement with
an outside credit card processor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Selectmen are also looking for
the approval of an $960,000 appropriation
for the construction of
a highway complex, which would
include a salt shed, next to the
transfer station. The purchase of
a $155,000 ambulance for the fire
department will also be presented
before voters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The board is also asking taxpayers
to consider an appropriation
of $176,000 for the final costs
associated with the engineering,
designing and construction of
improvements and renovations to
the Windham Depot area, predicated
on an 80 percent reimbursement
by the state, leaving $28,000
to the taxpayers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters will have the opportunity
to weigh in on a petitioned
warrant article by Wayne Morris
calling on the town to raise a further
$5 million in bonds for the
purchase of farmland to be turned
into conservation land.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Selectmen are also asking for
approval of the town&amp;rsquo;s $12.3 million
operating budget for next
year. Were residents to approve
the budget as worded on Saturday,
but vote it down in March,
the town&amp;rsquo;s default operating budget
is $12 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12680" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Taxes/default.aspx">Taxes</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category></item><item><title>Doyle to stand trial for pushing Windham election worker</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/10/08/Doyle-to-stand-trial-for-pushing-Windham-election-worker.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:11502</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/11502.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=11502</wfw:commentRss><description>BY &lt;a href="mailto:jmcdowell@yourneighborhoodnews.com" target="_blank"&gt;JENN McDOWELL&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than three years after
he allegedly assaulted a checklist
supervisor in Windham, a
former state representative and
town selectman will face a trial
for felony assault of a town officer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Christopher Doyle, 30, of
Windham, is accused of striking
Gail Webster, a supervisor
of Windham&amp;rsquo;s checklist, when
she attempted to intervene in an
altercation related to his loss in
a re-election vote for selectman
at the polls on March 8, 2005, at
Golden Brook Elementary.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After numerous delays, a
Supreme Court appeal of his indictment
and several changes of
counsel, Doyle&amp;rsquo;s trial was set to
begin on Monday, Sept. 29.
When Doyle failed to appear
at a pre-trial hearing on Thursday,
Sept. 18, a warrant was issued
for his arrest.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doyle was arrested on Thursday,
Oct. 1, after he walked into
an FBI office in Lowell, Mass.,
inquiring about federal election
laws. When an FBI agent determined
there was a warrant out
for Doyle&amp;rsquo;s arrest, he was turned
over to Plaistow police.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doyle&amp;rsquo;s bail hearing was
scheduled for Wednesday, Oct. 8,
in Rockingham County Superior
Court. A new
pre-trial hearing
has been
set for Wednesday,
Nov. 19, at
9 a.m., and his
trial is set to begin
on Monday,
Dec. 1.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According
to court documents,
Doyle filed a written motion
with Superior Court to recall
the warrant issued for his arrest
on Monday, Sept. 22, saying he
did not receive notification of
the pre-trial hearing he missed.
That motion was denied.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doyle&amp;rsquo;s latest attorney filed
a motion to withdraw from the
case at the Sept. 18 pre-trial hearing,
saying Doyle had not paid
him for his services.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Londonderry police began
looking for Doyle after he called
the station on Sept. 29, saying
he was going to turn himself
in. Doyle&amp;rsquo;s parents live in Londonderry,
but Doyle failed to
turn himself in that day, prompting
the search.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After the polls closed on
March 8, 2005, Doyle&amp;rsquo;s father
Edward Doyle, allegedly got into
an altercation with Windham
Selectman Bruce Breton over his
son&amp;rsquo;s loss of his seat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Webster, 62, allegedly tried
to intervene and went to find a
police officer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;According to a police affidavit
including witness accounts,
Webster tried to go into the hallway
where the argument was
taking place and Doyle, then 27,
tried to prevent her from doing
so by pushing her.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The felony assault charge alleges
Webster, a town official as
checklist supervisor, was assaulted
while discharging her duties.
At the time, Webster was also
running for cemetery trustee.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doyle filed to dismiss his indictment
on the felony charge
in February 2006, which a Rockingham
Superior Court judge
denied.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In September 2007, an appeal
of Doyle&amp;rsquo;s indictment went to
the state Supreme Court, where
Doyle&amp;rsquo;s then-lawyer Michael
Ricker argued Webster&amp;rsquo;s status at
the time of the assault as a candidate
for office negated her town
officer status, therefore making
the felony assault charge void.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Assistant Attorney General
James Kennedy argued in that case
that while Webster should have
been temporarily replaced as checklist
supervisor in light of her candidacy,
she wasn&amp;rsquo;t, and was, indeed,
functioning as a town official.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A Supreme Court judge ruled
Webster would have retained
her title as checklist supervisor
even if she had been temporarily
replaced.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The court agreed with Doyle
that Webster should not have
been performing her checklist
duties at the time, but said the
town was not aware of her disqualification
until after Doyle&amp;rsquo;s
indictment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The court also said even
though it may have been a conflict
of interest, Webster was
functioning at the time of the assault
as the checklist supervisor,
supporting the assault charge
under state law.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doyle was offered a plea
bargain in October 2005, which
would have downgraded the
charge to a misdemeanor. Pleading
guilty to that charge would
have given him a one-year suspended
jail sentence, and he
would face no jail time or probation
provided he stayed out of
trouble for two years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Under the bargain&amp;rsquo;s terms,
he would have had to apologize
to Webster, perform 100 hours
of community service, get into
an anger management treatment
program, give up any town offices
he held and be prevented
from holding any public office
for two years. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At the time, he was
offered the deal, Doyle chaired
the town&amp;rsquo;s Zoning Board.
Doyle initially accepted the
agreement, but later changed his
mind. He now faces fines and a
three-and-a-half- to seven-year
sentence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11502" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/volunteering/default.aspx">volunteering</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/vote/default.aspx">vote</category></item><item><title>Special Windham election for high school road bond</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/06/11/Special-Windham-election-for-high-school-road-bond.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:8613</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/8613.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8613</wfw:commentRss><description>BY &lt;a href="mailto:jmcdowell@yourneighborhoodnews.com" target="_blank"&gt;JENN McDOWELL&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windham&amp;rsquo;s Board of Selectmen
is planning a special election
in September to obtain funding
for a secondary access road
for the new high school currently
under construction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new road would overlap
the current London Bridge Road,
connecting the entrance to the
high school on Route 111 to
Castle Hill Road behind the high
school, said Town Administrator
David Sullivan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed warrant for the
special election asks for voters to
authorize taking out a $1.25 million
bond and to accept any forthcoming
grants toward the project
costs. The Board of Selectmen
approved the warrant at their
meeting on Monday, June 9.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sullivan said the town had
planned on putting the project
on its budget, but Selectman
Charles McMahon submitted a
petitioned warrant article for the
townwide vote last March to put
it on the school district budget,
which would allow the project to
qualify for 30 percent state reimbursement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That warrant article failed
with voters. The project does not
qualify for state reimbursement,
Sullivan said, because it will not
be a part of the school district&amp;rsquo;s
budget.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;The way we&amp;rsquo;re moving forward,
it&amp;rsquo;s going to be part of the
town&amp;rsquo;s budget,&amp;rdquo; Sullivan said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A hearing on the conditional
layout of the road, which would
include construction parameters,
width and a Board of Selectmen
decision on whether the road is
necessary will take place Monday,
July 21, Sullivan said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to taking public input, the
board will attend a site walk of the
future road starting at 6 p.m.
Sullivan said a deliberative
session for the warrant will take
place the week of Aug. 6, with
the hope of including the warrant
on the primary ballot for
Tuesday, Sept. 9.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8613" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/high+school/default.aspx">high school</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/windham+high+school/default.aspx">windham high school</category></item><item><title>Windham: yes to town, no to school sports</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/03/12/Windham_3A00_-yes-to-town_2C00_-no-to-school-sports.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:7546</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/7546.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7546</wfw:commentRss><description>BY &lt;a href="mailto:jmcdowell@yourneighborhoodnews.com" target="_blank"&gt;JENN McDOWELL&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;School items&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new Windham High
School may have new colors and
a new mascot after a citizen petitioned
warrant article was approved
by voters. But big-ticket
warrants dealing with athletic
facilities were soundly defeated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $34.4 million school operating
budget passed 1,503-869.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A total of 2,588 of Windham&amp;rsquo;s
9,208 registered voters weighed
in on March 11, a turnout of 28
percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael Hatem and Mark
Brockmeier took the two open
School Board seats, Hatem receiving
1,346 votes and Brockmeier
889
votes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Article 5,
asking voters
to fund a
$1.25 million bond to construct a
secondary access from the High
School was voted down by a slim
margin, 1,270 to 1,234.
Article 16, on the ballot by
petition, asked voters to change
the Windham High School colors
to green, gold and white, and
to make the Wildcat the school&amp;rsquo;s
official mascot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters passed the article in a
1,414-to-973 vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windham voters also defeated approving a bond to construct
an additional gymnasium and
sports center plus three more
athletic fields at Windham High
School.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The items contained in the
$5,498,480 article, including all
design and engineering costs,
road and site work, and construction
were consolidated into one
article at the school district deliberative
sesson. The article failed
in a 1,370-to-1,179 vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A three-year collective bargaining
agreement between
the School Board and teacher&amp;rsquo;s
union passed with 1,600 voters
approving its funding and 819
opposing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The agreement will pay
out $484,060 in teacher salary
and benefit increases for 2008-
09; $507,620 for 2009-10; and
$483,618 for 2010-11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An article asking for $65,000
to add a new Spanish teacher position
at the school failed. Also,
an attempt to add an assistant
principal position for Golden
Brook Elementary School was
defeated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters did support a Windham
School Board initiative to
explore breaking away from
School Administrative Unit 28,
which also covers Pelham. Article
14, which passed in a 1,563
to 766 vote, allows the School
Board to establish a committee to
look into the withdrawal.
The School Board will appoint
two members, the school
district moderator will appoint
five members and the superintendent
&amp;ndash; currently Dr. Frank
Bass &amp;ndash; would serve as a nonvoting
member on the committee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windham voters also favored
changing the terms of the school
district clerk, moderator and treasurer
to three years from the current
one-year term, with 1,701
voting in favor and 688 against.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Town items&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windham voters pass all
money warrant items placed before
them on the ballot this year.
About 28 percent of the 9,208
voters on the checklist voted on
Tuesday, March 11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Board of Selectmen
race, candidates vied for two
open three-year seats; Charles
McMahon and Galen Stearns
came out of the race sitting in
them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McMahon, a state representative
and former selectman, received
a total of 1,241 votes. Also
a former selectman, Stearns won
the most votes with a total of
1,256.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I appreciate
the support
of all my
friends and
neighbors who voted for me, and
I commit to do the best job that
they expect me to,&amp;rdquo; said McMahon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters approved the town&amp;rsquo;s
proposed 2008-09 operating
budget of $11,645,020 by a wide
margin, with 1,850 voting in favor
and 544 voting against.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All monetary warrant articles
passed, representing a 6.47
percent increase over last year&amp;rsquo;s
town budget.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The projected increase in the
tax rate is 34 cents per $1,000
of assessed value, assuming
the town&amp;rsquo;s revenue projections
are met. For homes assessed at
$300,000, this is a projected tax
bill increase of $102 for the coming
year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the articles on the
ballot was one to hire four additional
firefighters to the Windham
Fire Department with the
help of a federal grant from
Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Emergency Response (SAFER).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article passed with a
vote of 1,308 to 1,089, agreeing
to raise $182,230 in taxes for the
town&amp;rsquo;s portion of the costs, with
SAFER providing $101,200.
The amount reimbursed will
decline over the coming years
until 2012. By then, Windham
taxpayers will have contributed
$1,154,925 and the grant will
have reimbursed $421,700.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Article 14, which asked voters
for $73,200 to construct bike
paths along Route 111 from Lowell
Road to Golden Brook School,
passed 1,472 to 847. The money
will be added to $160,000 previously
raised by taxpayers in past
years, the total town share being
$233,200. The state is paying 80
percent of the total costs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Article 15, asking for $33,000
for design and engineering costs
to repair Windham Depot, passed
1,471 to 910. The state will pay 80
percent of the total project costs,
the town&amp;rsquo;s overall share being
$52,000 with the state reimbursing
$210,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Police and fire union contracts
also went through.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Voters also approved Article
13 in a 1,569-to-731 vote, asking
taxpayers to raise $11,317 for
the town&amp;rsquo;s share of the building
costs to renovate the Castlehill
Road Bridge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state is paying $401,268
for the project, 80 percent of the
total amount of $501,585, and
a private developer is paying
$89,000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7546" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category></item><item><title>2008 Windham Election Results</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/03/12/2008-Windham-Election-Results.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:7532</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/7532.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7532</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windham Town Warrants&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unofficial returns, &amp;bull; denotes winner&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Article 4: To raise $30,000 to be added to the Property Maintenance Expendable&lt;br /&gt;Trust Fund.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,398 No................................877&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 5: To raise $30,000 to be added to the Earned Time Expendable Trust&lt;br /&gt;Fund.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,254 No................................984&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 6: To $275,425 for increased economic benefi ts for members of Local&lt;br /&gt;Union 3657 AFSCME (police union) for the fi scal years 2006-08.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,509 No................................785&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 7: To raise $29,630 for increased economic benefi ts for members of Local&lt;br /&gt;Union No. 2915 IAFF (fi re union) for 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,572 No................................719&lt;br /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 8: To raise $26,510 for increased economic benefi ts for members of Local&lt;br /&gt;Union No. 1801 AFSCME (municipal union) for 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,440 No................................826&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 9: If Articles 6, 7 or 8, are defeated, to authorize the governing body to call&lt;br /&gt;one special meeting, at its option, to address Article(s) 6, 7 or 8, cost items only?&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,402 No................................848&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 10: To raise $12,000, said amount to be withdrawn from the balance in&lt;br /&gt;the previously established Searles Special Revenue Fund for payment of both marketing&lt;br /&gt;related and maintenance-related costs.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,746 No................................537&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 11: To raise $12,560 to be withdrawn from the balance in the previously&lt;br /&gt;established Searles Special Revenue Fund to pay the principal and interest on the outstanding&lt;br /&gt;loan taken to fund renovations and repairs to the west wing of the building&lt;br /&gt;in 2003.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,803 No................................472&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 12: To raise $54,080 to purchase a transfer/disposal trailer for the Transfer&lt;br /&gt;and Recycling Department.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,573 No................................698&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 13: To raise $501,585 to replace the Castlehill Road Bridge.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,569 No................................731&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 14: To raise $73,200 fund a portion of the town&amp;rsquo;s 20 percent share of the&lt;br /&gt;costs associated with the establishment of bike paths along Lowell Road.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,472 No................................847&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 15: To raise $33,000 to develop engineering and design plans associated&lt;br /&gt;with the improvements and renovations to the Windham Depot area.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,471 No................................910&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 16: To raise $90,000 to be added to the existing Salt Shed/Highway Facility&lt;br /&gt;Capital Reserve Fund.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,535 No................................822&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 17: To raise $70,000 to renovate Nesmith Library.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,457 No................................948&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 18: To raise $3,985 to pay additional costs needed to implement a staff&lt;br /&gt;reorganization plan within the town&amp;rsquo;s maintenance department.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,486 No................................859&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 19: To raise $15,000 for a salt shed /highway garage engineering/feasibility&lt;br /&gt;study.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,446 No................................883&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 20: To raise $182,230 to hire four additional fi refi ghter/EMTs for the&lt;br /&gt;Windham Fire Department.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,308 No................................1,089&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 21: To raise $2,350 for the Conservation Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,595 No................................728&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 22: To approve conveying portions of town-owned&lt;br /&gt;land totaling 16 acres to the Windham School District.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,524 No................................927&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 23: To adopt a comprehensive amendment to the&lt;br /&gt;Windham blasting ordinance.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,735 No................................432&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 24: To amend the Windham solid waste ordinance.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,521 No................................685&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 25: To require all votes of the Board of Selectmen relative to budget items&lt;br /&gt;or warrant articles be recorded and the numerical tally of any such vote be printed in&lt;br /&gt;the town warrant next to the aff ected warrant article.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,938 No................................240&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 26: To discontinue a 5,313-square-foot portion of the westerly line of&lt;br /&gt;Londonderry Road.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,575 No................................516&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 27: To discontinue that portion of an old woods road historically known as&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The Old County Road.&amp;rdquo; By petition.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,550 No................................568&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 28: To discontinue a town-owned walking path easement located across&lt;br /&gt;at 26 Bear Hill Road. By petition.&lt;br /&gt;Yes................................483 &amp;bull; No................................1,682&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 29: To discontinue a town-owned pedestrian easement located across 19&lt;br /&gt;Squire Armour Road. By petition.&lt;br /&gt;Yes................................394 &amp;bull; No................................1,789&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 30: To adopt a noise ordinance.By petition.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,403 No................................803&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 31: To encourage the School Board to negotiate an appropriate transition&lt;br /&gt;of our students from Salem High School to the new Windham High School.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,617 No................................565&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 32: To raise as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special&lt;br /&gt;warrant articles and other appropriations voted separately, the amount totaling&lt;br /&gt;$11,645,020.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,850 No................................544&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windham Town Candidates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unofficial returns, &amp;bull; denotes winner&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Selectman, for three years, vote for two&lt;br /&gt;Bruce H. Richardson &amp;ndash; 540&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Galen Stearns &amp;ndash; 1,256&lt;br /&gt;Ross McLeod &amp;ndash; 1,176&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Charles McMahon &amp;ndash; 1,241&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Planning board, for three years, vote for two&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Philip LoChiatto &amp;ndash; 1,430&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Rick Okerman &amp;ndash; 1,420&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Moderator for two years, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Peter Griffi n &amp;ndash; 1,906&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Cemetery Trustee, for three years, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Gail Webster &amp;ndash; 1,360&lt;br /&gt;Mark Brockmeier &amp;ndash; 657&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Supervisor of the checklist, for six years, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Robert A. Skinner &amp;ndash; 1,748&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Trustee of the Trust Fund, for three years, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Alphonse J. Marcil Jr. &amp;ndash; 1,668&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Zoning Board of Adjustment, for one year, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Thomas J. Murray &amp;ndash; 1,647&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Zoning Board of Adjustment, for three years, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Mark Samsel &amp;ndash; 1,706&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Library trustee, for one year, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;Anne-Marie O&amp;rsquo;Neil &amp;ndash; 558&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Carolyn B. Webber &amp;ndash; 824&lt;br /&gt;Joyce Wilt &amp;ndash; 568&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Library trustee, for three years, vote for two&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Mark Branoff &amp;ndash; 1,687&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windham School Warrants&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unofficial returns, &amp;bull; denotes winner&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Article 2: To raise $5,498,480 for the construction of a Windham High School&lt;br /&gt;second gymnasium at the high school and for the construction of three additional&lt;br /&gt;athletic fields at Windham High School and for the architectural, engineering and&lt;br /&gt;permitting fees for the completion of final construction documents for the Windham&lt;br /&gt;High School multi-purpose sports center. Three-fifths majority required. Recommended&lt;br /&gt;by the School Board.&lt;br /&gt;Yes................................1,179 &amp;bull; No................................1,370&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 3: To raise and appropriate $0 under this article because the purposes&lt;br /&gt;of the article have been consolidated into Article 2.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull;Yes................................1,209 No................................764&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 4: To raise and appropriate $0 under this article because the purposes&lt;br /&gt;of the article have been consolidated into Article 2.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,163 No................................773&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 5: To raise $1,250,000 for the purpose of engineering and constructing&lt;br /&gt;a new road, which will serve as a second access road to the high school. Citizen petition.&lt;br /&gt;Three/fi fths majority required. Recommended by School Board.&lt;br /&gt;Yes................................1,234 &amp;bull; No................................1,270&lt;br /&gt;------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 6: To accept a transfer of land from the own of approximately 16 acres&lt;br /&gt;from land known as the Gage property and authorize the School Board to swap back&lt;br /&gt;to the town a portion of the school district&amp;rsquo;s land that is at least twice the acreage of&lt;br /&gt;land accepted. Recommended by the Windham School Board.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,658 No................................821&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 7: To approve the cost items included in the collective bargaining&lt;br /&gt;agreement reached between the Windham School Board and the Windham Education&lt;br /&gt;Association and raise $484,060 for the upcoming year.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,600 No................................819&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 8: To authorize the governing body to call one special meeting, at its&lt;br /&gt;option, to address Article 7 cost items only?&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,425 No................................846&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 9: To raise $286,082 to be added to the Driveway/Parking Lot Paving&lt;br /&gt;Capital Reserve Fund established for Windham High School. Recommended by&lt;br /&gt;School Board.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,667 No................................751&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 10: To raise $100,000 to be placed in the School Buildings and Grounds&lt;br /&gt;Maintenance Fund. Recommended by School Board.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,791 No...............................621&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 11: To add a new assistant principal position at the Golden Brook Elementary&lt;br /&gt;School and raise $95,000 to be added to the operating budget for the salary&lt;br /&gt;and benefits for this additional position. Recommended by the School Board.&lt;br /&gt;Yes................................886 &amp;bull; No................................1,558&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 12: To add a new Spanish teacher position at the Windham Middle&lt;br /&gt;School and raise $65,000 to be added to the operating budget for the salary and&lt;br /&gt;benefits for this additional position. Recommended by the School Board.&lt;br /&gt;Yes................................1,130 &amp;bull; No................................1,289&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 13: To raise an operating budget totaling $34,453,396. Should this article&lt;br /&gt;be defeated, the default budget shall be $34,185,643 which is the same as last&lt;br /&gt;year, with certain adjustments.Recommended by the School Board.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,503 No................................869&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 14: To create a planning committee to consider withdrawal from and/&lt;br /&gt;or reorganization of, the School Administrative Unit No. 28; the committee to consist&lt;br /&gt;of two members of the School Board appointed by the School Board, fi ve public&lt;br /&gt;members appointed by the moderator; and the superintendent of schools, who will&lt;br /&gt;serve as a nonvoting member of the committee.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,563 No................................766&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 15: To change the terms of the school district clerk, moderator and&lt;br /&gt;treasurer from one year to three years, beginning with the terms of the school district&lt;br /&gt;clerk, moderator and treasurer to be elected at next year&amp;rsquo;s regular school district&lt;br /&gt;meeting. Citizen petition. Recommended by the School Board.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes................................1,701 No...............................688&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Article 16: Citizens petition by Jim Curtin and others to keep with the traditions&lt;br /&gt;of Windham, NH since the Searles School and requiring the Windham School&lt;br /&gt;Board to make the official colors of Windham High School green, gold and white&lt;br /&gt;and the official mascot the wildcat. Not recommended by the School Board.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Yes...............................1,414 No................................973&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Voter turnout: 2,588&lt;br /&gt;Registered voters: 9,208 Turnout percentage: 40% &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Windham School Candidates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unofficial returns, &amp;bull; denotes winner&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;School Board, for three years, vote for two&lt;br /&gt;Christine Lane &amp;ndash; 650&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Mark Brockmeier &amp;ndash; 889&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Michael Hatem &amp;ndash; 1,346&lt;br /&gt;*** Forde (write-in) &amp;ndash; 296&lt;br /&gt;Laura Bellavia (write-in) &amp;ndash; 840&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Moderator, for one year, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Elizabeth Dunn &amp;ndash; 1,827&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;School district clerk, for one year, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Mary Ann Horaj &amp;ndash; 1,756&lt;br /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Treasurer, for one year, vote for one&lt;br /&gt;&amp;bull; Maura Pennisi &amp;ndash; 1,718 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7532" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category></item><item><title>Additional athletic facilities on Windham ballot</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/03/05/Additional-athletic-facilities-on-Windham-ballot.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:7430</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/7430.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7430</wfw:commentRss><description>BY &lt;a href="mailto:dhalen@yourneighborhoodnews.com"&gt;DARRELL HALEN&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the items facing
Windham voters on March 11 is
the decision of whether to spend
money to provide additional athletic
facilities to the town&amp;rsquo;s new
high school.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A majority of the School
Board is recommending a
$5,498,480 bond warrant article
to construct additional athletic
facilities at Windham High
School: three additional fields, a
second gymnasium and a multipurpose
sports center, which
would include a track with an
artificial turf field, bleachers
and other amenities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The estimated tax impact on
a $400,000 home is $68 per year.
The school is scheduled to open
in the fall of 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new facilities were originally
proposed in separate warrant
articles,
but voters approved
consolidating
them into
a single proposal at the school
district&amp;rsquo;s deliberative session.
The article requires at least a
60 percent majority on Election
Day, Tuesday, March 11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to accommodate the
new facilities, voters are being
asked to approve a land swap in
which 16 acres of recreation and
conservation property would be
transferred from the town to the
school district, and the town,
in exchange, would receive 40
acres of school district land.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A $1.25 million bond article
would fund the construction of
a second access road to the new
high school. The road would be
built over the area of the former
London Bridge Road from the
school&amp;rsquo;s entrance to Castlehill
Road. If the article is approved,
officials would have the authority
to use federal, state and private
funds toward the project.
The article requires a 60 percent
majority.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The School Board is proposing
a $34,453,396 operating budget,
which includes three new
positions at the middle school
and eight new positions at the
high school.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also on the ballot is a new
collective three-year bargaining
agreement between the School
Board and the teachers union
which provides increases in salaries
and benefits of $484,060
in 2008-09; $507,620 in 2009-10;
and $483,618 in 2010-11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a half-dozen other
warrant articles, most of which
seek money for capital improvements
and new positions. Voters
will decide if they want to form
a study committee to explore
Windham breaking away from
School Administrative Unit 28,
which also includes the Pelham
School District.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two seats are available on
the School Board, and five candidates
are running: Michael
Hatem, Mark Brockmeier and
Chris Lane, along with write-in
candidates *** Forde and Laura
Bellavia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Town ballot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are 26 zoning questions,
29 warrant articles and a
contest for a pair of seats on the
Board of Selectmen on the town
ballot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If voters approve, the town
will hire four new firefighters
and use a federal homeland
security grant, if obtained, to
defray some of the costs. From
2008 to 2012, the town&amp;rsquo;s share
will be $1,154,925, and the grant
will provide $421,700.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After that, the town assumes
full cost of the new firefighters.
The article will be null and
void if the town doesn&amp;rsquo;t win the
grant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A revised blasting ordinance
has been proposed. Under the
proposed new rules, blasting and
detonation would be allowed
only between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
and not permitted on weekends
and town-observed holidays.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Selectmen are proposing
a 2008 operating budget of
$11,645,020. If the budget and
all money warrant articles are
approved and officials receive
all the revenues they hope for,
the town tax rate will increase
roughly 34 cents per $1,000 of
assessed valuation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the money sought by
officials will allow them to move
forward with capital improvement
projects which are being
partially funded by the state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters are being asked to
approve spending $501,585 to
replace the Castle Hill Road
Bridge, which crosses Beaver
Brook at the Windham-Pelham
border. By approving a warrant
article to authorize this expenditure,
voters will also allow
selectmen to accept 80 percent
in bridge aid from the state and
an $89,000 donation from a developer,
leaving $11,317 to be
raised by taxes. The total cost
of the project is $636,385.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Selectmen are asking voters
to approve spending $73,200 to
fund a portion of the town&amp;rsquo;s 20
percent share of the costs to construct
bike paths along Lowell
Road from Route 111 to Golden
Brook School. The state will pay
for 80 percent of this project.
The town&amp;rsquo;s estimated 20
percent share is $233,200 and
$160,000 has already been raised
at previous town meetings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Officials hope to renovate
and repair the buildings and
grounds at the old train depot
area on Depot Road. Voters are
being asked to approve spending
$33,000 this year for engineering
and design plans. The state
will provide 80 percent of the
$210,000 project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two seats are available on
the Board of Selectmen, and
four men are running: Planning
Board member Ross McLeod;
former selectman Galen Stearns;
Zoning Board of Adjustment
member Bruce Richardson; and
state Rep. Charles McMahon, a
former selectman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters will cast ballots between
7 a.m. and 8 p.m. at Golden
Brook School.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7430" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/high+school+sports/default.aspx">high school sports</category></item><item><title>Parents petition to have Windham high school open with just freshmen and</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/01/30/Parents-petition-to-have-Windham-high-school-open-with-just-freshmen-and.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:6837</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/6837.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6837</wfw:commentRss><description>
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="mailto:dhalen@yourneighborhoodnews.com"&gt;Darrell Halen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freshman Chris DiPersio likes going to Salem High School, where is he actively
involved in the band program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
And he wants to stay there, even though his town will be opening a brand-new
high school next year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
DiPersio was one of several students and parents who weighed in at a Windham
School Board meeting on whether Windham High School should start with four grades &amp;ndash; or
as few as two &amp;ndash; when it opens its doors in fall 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
More than a year ago, the School Board voted to have a full school &amp;ndash; grades
9 through 12 &amp;ndash; when the school opens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
But recently, several parents and students have asked the School Board to reverse
its decision and open the school with only freshmen and sophomores and allow
juniors and seniors to finish their careers at Salem High School before Windham
High School becomes a full school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
They made their arguments late last year and aired them again at the board&amp;rsquo;s
Tuesday, Jan. 22, meeting. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The last two years of high school are particularly important for students because
that&amp;rsquo;s when they are gearing up for college, some of them said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Eleventh and 12th grades are where you&amp;rsquo;re taking the courses, applying
to colleges and becoming integrated in a system that is going to move you into
the college of your choice if that&amp;rsquo;s the field you want to go into,&amp;rdquo; said
Renee Solomon, a mother of a freshman and a junior at Salem High.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Another mother, Lisa Van Berlo, said it was unconscionable for the School Board
to move students out of Salem during those years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s like transplanting a tree in the middle of winter. It makes
no sense,&amp;rdquo; said Van Berlo. &amp;ldquo;This does not just affect a class ring.
It&amp;rsquo;s their future.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
School Board members did not make a decision that night. Some said they were
receptive to receiving more information before doing so. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
School Board member Barbara Coish, however, said she would not change her vote,
and another member, Beverly Donovan, said she thinks the board should stick with
its plan to open with four grades.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
It&amp;rsquo;s a decision that is not easy for School Board members because they
know some people will be unhappy with whatever decision they make.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;None of these solutions are terrific,&amp;rdquo; said Superintendent Frank
Bass. &amp;ldquo;None of them solve all the issues. With each solution you propose,
there are drawbacks.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Currently, about 650 Windham students attend Salem High School, with Windham
paying to send those students there through an agreement between the two communities. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Salem is willing to take Windham students as tuition students after Windham opens
its own high school. Several people said they believe that if the Windham school
opens for all four grades, there might be few upperclassmen there because many
parents will opt to keep their children in Salem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Those who do go to Windham, some said, may be those students whose parents can&amp;rsquo;t
afford the tuition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Several students told the board they&amp;rsquo;re unsure if Windham&amp;rsquo;s high
school will provide the same opportunities they enjoy in Salem. And they don&amp;rsquo;t
like the idea of leaving some of their schoolmates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;ve met many people and met new friends,&amp;rdquo; said freshman
Kim Movsesian, adding that students at Salem High, despite coming from two towns,
think of themselves as one community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;They&amp;rsquo;re part of a community. It&amp;rsquo;s extremely difficult for
(them) to abandon that community and come to a new school,&amp;rdquo; Bass said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
About 40 people attended the meeting, and several speakers drew applause when
they finished their remarks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Not everyone, however, believes the school should have only freshmen and sophomores
when it opens. Some parents have said they are concerned that the school will
lack a &amp;ldquo;critical mass&amp;rdquo; of students to support a genuine high school
experience for their children.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
One parent, Patty Michal, asked the School Board to think about the students
who are currently in middle school and will be in the new high school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There are a lot of (kids) who have to go to that high school who want
a real high school experience,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;A school with two grades,
to me, is truly not a high school experience.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Another mother, Cindy Hastings, said she worries about the message sent to the
community at a time when the School Board is asking for more money to provide
additional athletic facilities at Windham High School. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;To me, if you open a high school with just two classes, it says to the
voters: We don&amp;rsquo;t need the facilities, we don&amp;rsquo;t need the fields and
we can put off those things,&amp;rdquo; she said.

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6837" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Taxes/default.aspx">Taxes</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/high+school/default.aspx">high school</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/buget/default.aspx">buget</category></item><item><title>$11.6 million budget to be discussed</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/01/30/_2400_11.6-million-budget-to-be-discussed.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:6834</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/6834.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6834</wfw:commentRss><description>
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="mailto:dhalen@yourneighborhoodnews.com"&gt;Darrell Halen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Voters will have an opportunity to let their voices be heard when they take up
a proposed $11.6 million operating budget and 28 other warrant articles at Windham&amp;rsquo;s
town deliberative session. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
They will gather on Saturday, Feb. 9, starting at 9 a.m., at Golden Brook School.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If the $11,645,020 budget and all warrant articles pass and the town receives
grants, donations and other funds, officials hope for, the net increase in spending
would be $757,167 or 6.47 percent. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Voters will consider adopting a new blasting ordinance and a noise ordinance,
and transferring 16 acres of recreation and conservation land to the school district,
land school officials need to accommodate additional athletic facilities, as
part of a land swap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Other money warrant articles voters will look at include:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $275,425 for increased salary and benefits to the police union, in accordance
with a collective bargaining union with the town.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $54,080 for a trailer for the Transfer and Recycling Department.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $29,630 for increased salary and benefits to the firefighter&amp;rsquo;s union.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Add $90,000 to a salt shed/highway facility capital reserve fund&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $70,000 for renovations to the Nesmith Library, including exterior painting
and interior lighting repairs and replacements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $26,510 for increased salary and benefits to municipal workers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $3,985 to replace two part-time maintenance workers with a full-time employee,
beginning in June.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $15,000 for a salt shed/highway garage engineering/feasibility study,
and to authorize the withdrawal of money from a capital reserve fund.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Voters are being asked to spend $182,230 to add four new firefighters
and to apply for a $101,200 Homeland Security grant to help cover the costs. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If the grant is obtained, the town&amp;rsquo;s reimbursement from the government
will diminish each year until 2013, when the town assumes the full cost of the
employees. The article will be null and void if the grant is not won.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Voters will also see requests for money for three projects that have been on
previous warrants: Castlehill Bridge, bike paths on Lowell Road and improvements
to an old train depot area. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The town is seeking to spend $501,585 to replace the bridge, which crosses Beaver
Brook at the Pelham-Windham border. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The state would provide 80 percent &amp;ndash; $401,268 &amp;ndash; in bridge aid, and
a developer working on a subdivision in the area would pay a $89,000 donation.
That would leave $11,317 to be raised by taxes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Selectmen are putting forward an article to spend $73,200 to fund a portion of
the town&amp;rsquo;s 20 percent share of the costs, including engineering, easement
acquisitions, right of way, and construction expenses, to build bike paths along
Lowell Road from Route 111 to Golden Brook School.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The state is picking up 80 percent of the cost, and is committing additional
funds to rehabilitate pavement and drainage on the road.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Voters have already put aside $160,000 of the town&amp;rsquo;s share of the project. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Selectmen are asking voters to approve spending $33,000 to develop engineering
and design plans to improve and renovate the Windham Depot area, and to accept
$20,000 of this appropriation from the state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The project&amp;rsquo;s total cost is expected to be $210,000, with the state paying
80 percent of the cost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Some warrant articles will have no effect on the tax rate:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Taking $12,000 from the Searles Special Revenue Fund to pay for marketing
and maintenance costs at the town-owned Searles School and Chapel, which is rented
out for functions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Using $12,560 from the same fund to pay on a loan taken to make renovations
and repairs to the building&amp;rsquo;s west wing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; A warrant article by citizen petition calls for allowing juniors and seniors
to continue attending Salem High School. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Because it was submitted to the town, selectmen felt obligated to put it on the
town warrant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
But the legality of the article &amp;ndash; whether a town vote can influence the
school district &amp;ndash; will likely be discussed at the deliberative session,
said Town Administrator David Sullivan.&amp;ordm;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6834" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Taxes/default.aspx">Taxes</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Town+Day/default.aspx">Town Day</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/buget/default.aspx">buget</category></item><item><title>Articles to enhance high school on this year’s ballot</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2008/01/30/Articles-to-enhance-high-school-on-this-year_1920_s-ballot.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:6832</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/6832.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6832</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="mailto:dhalen@yourneighborhoodnews.com"&gt;Darrell Halen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This year&amp;rsquo;s Windham School District warrant includes several articles to
provide money to Windham High School, which will open in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Those articles, and others, will be the subject of discussion and debate when
voters attend the school district&amp;rsquo;s Friday, Feb. 8, deliberative session. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The session starts at 7 p.m. and will be held at Golden Brook School.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
A majority of the School Board is supporting three bond articles to boost athletic
facilities at Windham High: $3,819,980 for a multipurpose sports center; $900,000
for a second gymnasium and $778,500 for three additional athletic fields.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Each bond article requires a 60 percent majority when voters go to the polls
on Tuesday, March 11.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
State Rep. Charles McMahon has submitted a $1.25 million warrant article by citizen
petition to construct a second access road for the high school. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The new road would be built over the area of the former London Bridge Road from
the high school to Castlehill Road. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Selectmen had proposed their own warrant article to build the new road but later
withdrew it. McMahon has said that by having the construction proposal on the
school district ballot, the project would qualify for 30 percent aid from the
state. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The School Board may recommend that wording of McMahon&amp;rsquo;s article be changed
at the deliberative session, but supports its intent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
To accommodate additional athletic facilities, the School Board is asking voters
to accept the transfer of 16 acres of recreation and conservation land from the
town. The district intends to transfer 40 acres of its land to the town in return.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Voters will be asked to approve a three-year collective bargaining agreement
between the School Board and the Windham Education Association that calls for
increases in salaries and benefits of $484,060 in 2008-09, $507,620 in 2009-10,
and $483,618 in 2010-11.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The warrant includes these other articles:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Add $286,082 to a capital reserve fund to fund repairs, replacements or
additions to the driveway, parking lot or a new parking area at the middle school.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Add $100,000 in surplus money to the school buildings and grounds maintenance
fund. The maximum amount of money to be put in the fund, created last year, is
$200,000 and would be replenished in future years. The fund&amp;rsquo;s purpose is
to cover unexpected repairs and replacements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $95,000 for salary and benefits to add an assistant principal at Golden
Brook School. The student population is approaching 500 students, the state&amp;rsquo;s
suggested threshold for adding an assistant principal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; $65,000 to add a Spanish teacher at the middle school. This increases
academic time for students and allows students entering high school to start
at a higher level in the subject.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;bull; Create a committee to study whether Windham should withdraw from SAU 28,
which also includes the Pelham School District.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both towns have been experiencing, over the past 10 years, an amazing
amount of growth,&amp;rdquo; said School Board member Beverly Donovan at public hearing
on the budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Two other warrant articles by citizen petition will appear on the warrant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
One would change the terms of the school district&amp;rsquo;s clerk, moderator and
treasurer from one year to three years beginning with the 2009 elections. It
is recommended by the School Board.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The other, submitted by Jim Curtin, would designate green, gold and white as
the officials colors of Windham High School, and the wildcat as the school&amp;rsquo;s
official mascot. The School Board opposes it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The School Board has already adopted the jaguar as the mascot, and navy blue,
metallic gold, and green as an accent color as the official colors, according
to School Board member Barbara Coish.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The School Board is recommending a 2008-09 school district operating budget of
$34,453,396. If the budget is turned down by voters in March, officials will
have to spend within a default budget, the previous budget with certain adjustments,
of $34,185,643.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The new budget includes money for eight positions at the high school, an increase
of $719,847 for Salem High School tuition, a $169,515 debt service increase for
outstanding bonds, more money to keep pace with rising fuel and electricity costs,
$85,062 more in transportation accounts, and more money for special education,
an area that accounted for 27 percent of the budget&amp;rsquo;s increase.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6832" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Taxes/default.aspx">Taxes</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/high+school/default.aspx">high school</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/buget/default.aspx">buget</category></item><item><title>Voters reject one school bond article</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/2007/03/14/Voters-reject-one-school-bond-article.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:1904</guid><dc:creator>Salem Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/comments/1904.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1904</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font face="NimbusSanL-BoldCond" size="1"&gt;BY &lt;a href="mailto:dhalen@yourneighborhoodnews.com"&gt;DARRELL HALEN&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The voters were given three options. They chose Option B.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By doing so, they approved a $4 million bond article and using $3 million in interest money to provide enough classroom space at Windham High School to accommodate 1,000 students.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m happy to have this vote behind us,&amp;rdquo; said school board member Al Letizio, Jr. &amp;ldquo;The board is going to come together and build what people have asked for.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Voters cast their ballots on Tuesday, March 13, at Golden Brook School.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The school board had presented warrant articles for the high school as three options. Option A was to approve only the interest money accrued from bonds approved for the building project two years ago, known on the ballot as Article 4.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Option B was to approve Article 2 &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp; the $4 million bond &amp;ndash; and the interest money. Option C was to add to those two spending measures with a $3 million bond for additional features. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m very happy Article 4 passed overwhelmingly and I&amp;rsquo;m very happy Article 2 passed,&amp;rdquo; said Bruce Anderson, the school board&amp;rsquo;s chairman. &amp;ldquo;The voters spoke and they showed they want us to build the building but perhaps are not ready for the extra sports facilities.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anderson said he was a little shocked that the second bond article, Article 3, which needed at a 60 percent majority, did not receive at least a majority of the vote. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Letizio said he believes the results were affected by negative information that was spread that confused voters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among the features the defeated bond article would have funded were lighting and bleachers for one field, a small gym, and converting a field to an artificial turf field.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By passing Articles 2 and 4, the school is expected to have classroom and core capacity for 1,000 students. Its kitchen will serve the school district and $2.5 million will be available for furnishings, fixtures and equipment. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The school board unanimously backed the interest money article but it was split over the bond articles. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anderson, Letizio and Beth Valentine supported the bond articles, while Barbara Coish and Beverly Donovan did not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coish said she was happy with the outcome.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;It was a good compromise,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m happy with Option B passing.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now the school board has more time to study putting athletic fields across the high school road and funding a running track, she said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WISE, Windham initiative to Support Education, an organization that backed the high school project two years ago, encouraged voters to back all three articles this year. The PTA also supported the three articles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This year&amp;rsquo;s ballot also featured a contested race for a one-year seat on the school board. Letizio defeated&lt;br /&gt;Michael Hatem 1,574 -1,427.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Letizio had been serving as an interim member since Galen Stearns resigned from the board last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Al has done a lot for this project and he&amp;rsquo;s been an asset on this board,&amp;rdquo; Anderson said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anderson was unopposed in his re-election bid for a three-year term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1904" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/Windham/default.aspx">Windham</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/schools/default.aspx">schools</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/windham_news/archive/tags/voting/default.aspx">voting</category></item></channel></rss>