By Darrell Halen
Staff Writer
Because Windham’s elderly
residents are expected
to be hit hard in the pocketbook
when they receive their
property tax bills this fall, selectmen
are hoping to come
up with a way to help them.
Due to a revaluation this
year, property values are increasing
40 percent on average.
Last year, voters increased
exemptions for the elderly
and the disabled. Officials
sought those higher exemptions
in light of the revaluation
to help them.
But while warrant articles
to modify exemptions passed,
a separate warrant article to
fund a revaluation was defeated
in 2005. The revaluation
was approved this year.
Officials are concerned
because new exemptions
don’t keep pace with new values
for the elderly this year,
effectively lowering their exemptions.
That has selectmen
thinking about how they can
ease the burden.
“We have long-term residents
in this town. I think we
have a duty and a responsibility
to them,” said selectman
Galen Stearn at the board’s
Sept. 25 meeting. “If we can
do something to help them,
especially seeing how this is
going to be a larger hit than
everyone else is given, I’d
like to do whatever we can to
do that.”
Voters in 2005 raised exemptions
to $125,000 for seniors
65 to 74 and to $150,000
for seniors 75 to 80 for those
who qualify for the break.
Older seniors are totally
exempt if they qualify. Disabled
who meet certain criteria
have a $125,000 exemption.
The current tax rate is
$19.46 per $1,000 of assessed
property valuation. Assessor
Rex Norman is predicting
a tax rate of approximately
$16 per $1,000 of assessed property valuation when it’s set
this fall.
The average taxpayer — an
owner of a $400,000 house
— will see an increase of $800 to
$1,000.
“This year, the elderly will be
hit probably the hardest,” Norman
said.
Town and school district
spending is up more than $4 million,
including roughly $2.6 million
in bond costs for the town’s
new high school.
Selectmen may decide to
help 74 elderly and disabled
homeowners by lowering their
values through an abatement
process. The move would shift
roughly $30,000 onto other taxpayers
to absorb.