NewHampshire.com logo   Search NewHampshire.com The homepage for New Hampshire
NewHampshire.com Discounts
Welcome to NewHampshire.com Communities Sign in | Join | Help

Hooksett Banner

News and Information for the Town of Hooksett

Report shows Hooksett Safety Center needs millions in repairs

By Eddie Wilson

A report detailing problems at the Hooksett Safety Center proposes between $500,000 and $3.5 million in repairs.

The building housing the police and fire stations has been plagued with problems since it was built in 1996, with leaks and other issues. The report notes these problems can result in “sick building syndrome,” a term used to describe situations in which building occupants can experience acute health effects that are linked to time spent in a building.

“Right now we are reviewing the report and will be coming back to the (Town) Council with further recommendations for next steps,” said Town Administrator Carol Granfield.

“The costs in the report are broad estimates and we really need to hire a construction manager to work with the architect to review and fine tune what is needed and cost estimates.”

Granfield said she is also pursuing energy grants to assist in paying for the fixes.

On March 5, with the Building Forensic Team, the H.L. Turner Group Inc. conducted a complete evaluation of the building’s overall condition and systems. In their report, the professional engineering and architectural group identified the primary cause of the building’s flaws a product of poor building construction detailing practices and no provision for air sealing at the structure’s perimeter envelope. The company predicts even more building failures if the structure’s current needs aren’t addressed.

In its report, the building forensic team addressed concerns about three areas – the safety center’s offices, stair tower and apparatus bays.

The report said the major point of concern surrounding the center’s offices are related to the environment’s air quality and pertinent life/safety of the occupants. The proposal estimated the lowest cost option for office repairs to be around $500,000; the accelerated cost option would reach $1 million.

Among the many changes proposed to ensure the office’s safe air quality are work on the building’s insulation and storm drainage system.

Amendments to the building’s stair tower were also proposed in the report. The changes, carrying a lowest cost option of $250,000 and an accelerated cost option of $500,000 would address problems with air ventilation and drainage issues.

The proposal’s final and most expensive alterations were linked to the building’s apparatus bays. Estimated costs were between $750,000 and $1.5 million. The major change proposed to the facility’s apparatus bays are to its roofing assembly. Where a new roofing system isn’t required, the report recommended that all the structure’s lap sealants should receive new sealant coverings, as they show signs of fatigue. This process would ensure the full 20-year useful life of the roof system.

Published Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:02 PM by Hooksett Editor

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Jim M, Hooksett, NH said:

$1.5 million in "repairs" would ensure the full 20-year life of the roof system? The building was built in 1996. It's ALREADY 13 years old! So $1.5 million in repairs for a section of the building will get 7 more years of life from the roof????? WHAT? For $1.5 million you damn sure ought to get an ENTIRE NEW ROOF FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. And if they really had half a brain they would go after the contractor or sub-contractors responsible for the original construction for reimbursement of part of that money. Anything less is a clear sign of fraud and abuse that has now become ravenous problem in Hooksett. Just a few more examples: - Oh the sewer upgrades will be no more than $2.x million for our part paid by the ratepayers We at the Commission assure you that we will definitely not seek more funding from the ratepayers than that. What was the final amount .. $3.x million? A 25% increase on the average bill! - Would you like to have an ambulance or have Tri-Town continue to service us? Oh .. well I know you all voted no but we're going to buy an ambulance anyway .. and train a couple people .. you know .. part-time just in case. Oh .. and since we've already bought the ambulance without your approval we're going to go ahead and make those positions full-time and drop Tri-Town. Emergency services will be a $90K plus money maker .. trust us. - We're going to go ahead and hire a town administrator part-time without your approval .. or even a quorum of council members. Oh, that person and contract we agreed to without full representation is working out well .. we'll go ahead and make that permanent too. - Let's go ahead and fire some people that supposedly started a rumor and make us a laughing stock .. even in Europe. Heck, anything that gets us on the map. Like $16 million grant for a sporting goods store that will sell Chinese goods and have some stuffed animals out front. Nobody has one of those and think of the minimum wage jobs it would create! That sounds good too. Except they bailed at $2 million .. guess that wasn't enough of a grant. - And how much was that sign in front of the Safety Center? - and if you can't see from these examples it's not even worth more typing ... THIS IS INSANITY!
June 4, 2009 3:25 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

This Blog


  Print This Page  |  Email This Page  |  Make Us Your Homepage!
User Agreement  |  Privacy Policy  |  © 2006 The Union Leader Corporation  |  Powered by SilverTech