NewHampshire.com logo   Search NewHampshire.com The homepage for New Hampshire
NewHampshire.com Discounts
Welcome to NewHampshire.com Communities Sign in | Join | Help

Hooksett Banner

News and Information for the Town of Hooksett

Hooksett Public TV vote again

BY GINGER KOZLOWSKI

A move is on to get a public access cable TV channel started in Hooksett, with supporters hoping the vote will be in their favor this year, unlike last year.

For decades, Comcast cable TV subscribers have paid a small franchise fee in their bills, which is sent to the town. It’s money meant for the town to be able to run a public TV channel, but because there is no such channel, the money has gone into the town’s general fund. That amounts to more than $100,000 a year.

On voting day in Hooksett, which is May 12, Warrant Article 20 will ask for those fees to be put toward a public access channel in a special fund, rather than the general fund.

According to a flier Hooksett resident David Pearl has distributed, a television studio could be set up at the Hooksett Town Hall, and meeting rooms at the building could be rigged with cameras and other necessary equipment which would allow meetings to be shown.

Other uses for the publicaccess channel include local programming about Hooksett, like sporting events, concerts and plays. Emergency announcements and instructions would be made on the channel. A message board could list upcoming town events and public information. Schools could even contribute by producing programming. The flier quotes several officials as being in support of the article.

Dr. Charles “Phil” Littlefield, SAU 15 superintendent, is quoted as saying, “The development of community-based television, among other things, provides Hooksett with the opportunity to bring government into every living room. It is a wonderful way to bring democracy to the people.”

Bill Gahara of HYAA supports the idea, as does Hooksett Town Councilor Paul Loiselle. Fire Chief Michael Williams says it would be a great tool for the Hooksett Fire Department.

“Communicating with our residents through television would be a great way for us to keep the residents informed about all Fire Department fundtions,” according to the flier.

While Pearl operates his own video business, he would not run the public access channel.

“First of all,” he said, “although I operate a video business, I don’t have a background in community TV. Second, I plan to devote all of my time to Spotlight Video. I would not rule out serving on a board, as a citizen. Pearl said the Town Council would be charged with creating a board to oversee the operation of the public channel.

“Some have mentioned that the warrant doesn’t address all of the specifics,” said Pearl. “That is because we are voting on creating community TV, not trying to set forth exactly how it would run. Should it pass, the people of Hooksett or their representatives will have to decide all of the details.”

Last year’s vote on the same topic failed 551-442. The 2 percent charge on each cable bill has continued to go into the general fund to help offset taxes.

Published Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:19 PM by Hooksett Editor

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

mogabe said:

Although unpopular amongst the subjects, taping and broadcasting the goings on at Council, Planning, ZBA, Police Commission, Sewer Commission, School Board and all the other meetings of persons entrusted with running the town can only improve their performances (even if that's all they are; performances). At the very least, it will add to the dwindling offerings of G-rated TV, (provided the rules are obeyed). Whether legally specified or not, this was the touted intent and purpose for these fees. Let's not follow the example of our state, where tolls go into whatever they want while bridges crumble, and the "rooms and meals" taxes get gobbled up by reckless state spending, (as you read), instead of being sent to the towns as originally promised in the campaigns to get these taxes passed. Let's actually use the money for what it was intended, or stop collecting it. Otherwise, it is just another hidden and unfair tax being forcibly taken from one group to benefit another.
April 17, 2009 7:37 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

This Blog


  Print This Page  |  Email This Page  |  Make Us Your Homepage!
User Agreement  |  Privacy Policy  |  © 2006 The Union Leader Corporation  |  Powered by SilverTech