NewHampshire.com logo   Search NewHampshire.com The homepage for New Hampshire
NewHampshire.com Discounts
Welcome to NewHampshire.com Communities Sign in | Join | Help

Fluoride Is Hazardous To Your Health

Scientific Evidence Shows How and Why

  • Fluoride Linked to Arthritis

    Fluoride: A Pain in the Neck - Case Report
     
    A 52-year-old American (New York) man’s arthritic-like joint pain and immobility went away after he stopped brushing his teeth with fluoridated toothpaste, according to a  study in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (1).
     
    There’s no scientific dispute that large fluoride doses cause crippling skeletal fluorosis over time.  (See.
    http://www.nalgonda.org/fluorosis/victims.htm) But, “less well-known causes of chronic fluoride toxicity include fluoride supplements, certain teas and wine and some toothpastes,” report researchers Kurland, et al. (1)
     
    Skeletal fluorosis often results in  abnormal bone hardening and thickening (osteosclerosis) with painful and impaired neck and spine mobility, spine curvature, and/or painful lower extremities ultimately causing crippling and incapacitation, report the researchers.
     
    In this case, the only obvious fluoride exposure was toothpaste. The patient drank no fluoridated water, tea or wine; had no occupational fluoride exposure; did not chew tobacco, inhale snuff, cook with Teflon pots, use fluoridated mouthwash or get fluoride treatments at twice-yearly dentist visits. But he brushed before and after all meals (minimum 6 times daily) with fluoridated toothpaste.
     
    Fluoride was elevated in his serum, urine and iliac crest (bone), the researchers report.
     
    Within 8 months of eliminating all obvious fluoride sources, the patient’s urinary and blood fluoride levels dropped and bone function markers showed clear cut improvement, the researchers report.
     
    “By approximately two years after diagnosis and apparent elimination of excess fluoride exposure, the patient had complete resolution of his neck immobility and no longer required analgesics,” the researchers write.
     
    Roos, et al. documents a woman whose painful swollen fingers healed after she ceased eating fluoridated toothpaste.(2)
     
    Whyte, et al. report a woman’s fluoride-caused debilitating joint pains disappeared when her two-gallon-a-day iced tea habit stopped.(3)
     
    Eichmiller, et al. report a patient’s leg and joint pains from a dentist-prescribed high-concentration fluoride product.(4)
     
     
    Osteoarthritis is linked to water fluoride in a Turkish study.(6)

    A 2009 Brazilian study shows that, after brushing with a fluoridated dentifrice, a substantial amount of fluoride is ingested by children. (7)
     
    “Fluoride at any level accumulates in the body,” says Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. “So even water fluoridation will cause arthritic-like symptoms in susceptible individuals which is compounded by U.S. physicians’and dentists' lack of training to diagnose fluoride toxicity.” (See:  http://tinyurl.com/Susheela

    “We know US schoolchildren are fluoride-overdosed (5). What’s it doing to their bones?” asks Beeber.
     
     
     
    References:
     
    1)   Recovery From Skeletal Fluorosis (An Enigmatic, American Case). Journal of Bone Mineral Research. October 2, 2006, by Kurland, et a.
     
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=17014382&query_hl=3&itool=pubmed_docsum
     
    (2) Osteofluorosis caused by excess use of toothpaste, Presse Med, 34:1518-20, by Roos et al November 2005
     
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16301964&query_hl=7&itool=pubmed_docsum
     
    (3) Environ Health Perspect. 2005 August; 113(8): “Food Safety: A Tea-Time Mystery,” by Michael Szpir
     
    http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1280381
     
     
    (4) Journal of the American Dental Association, "Controlling the
    fluoride dosage in a patient with compromised salivary function,"
    Frederick C. Eichmiller, D.D.S.; Naomi Eidelman, Ph.D.; Clifton M.
    Carey, PhD., Vol. 136, page 67 -70, January 2005
    http://jada.ada.org/cgi/content/full/136/1/67
     
    NYSCOF News Release:
    http://tinyurl.com/mbrmd
     
    (5) NYSCOF News release
    http://tinyurl.com/mbrmd  about 
     
    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for
    Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office of
    Communication,  8/25/05
     

     
    (6) http://www.orgsites.com/ny/newyorkstatecoalitionopposedtofluoridation/_pgg7.php3

    (7)  Rev Esp Salud Publica  2009 May-Jun;83(3):415-25. [Demonstration of fluoride systemic absorption secondary to toothbrushing with fluoride dentifrice in children]

     
     
     
     
     


     

     



  • Professionals Urge End to Water Fluoridaiton Citing Harmful Effects

    Over 1,700 professionals signed a statement urging Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted. They cite new scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. (http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html)
     
    Signers include a Nobel Prize winner, three members of the prestigious 2006 National Research Council (NRC) panel that reported on fluoride’s toxicology, two officers in the Union representing professionals at EPA headquarters, the President of the International Society of Doctors for the Environment, and hundreds of medical, dental, academic, scientific and environmental professionals, worldwide.
     
    Signer Dr. Arvid Carlsson, winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize for Medicine, says, “Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It's really obsolete.”
     
    An Online Action Petition to Congress in support of the Professionals' Statement is available on FAN's web site,
    http://congress.fluorideaction.net and over 11,000 individuals have signed so far.
     
    “The NRC report dramatically changed scientific understanding of fluoride's health risks," says Paul Connett, PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network.  "Government officials who continue to promote fluoridation must testify under oath as to why they are ignoring the powerful evidence of harm in the NRC report,” he added. 
     
    The Professionals’ Statement also references:
     
    -- The new American Dental Association policy recommending infant formula NOT be prepared with fluoridated water.
    -- The  CDC’s concession that the predominant benefit of fluoride is topical not systemic.
    -- CDC data showing that dental fluorosis, caused by fluoride over-exposure, now impacts one third of American children.
    -- Major research indicating little difference in decay rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities.
    -- A Harvard study indicating a possible link between fluoridation and bone cancer. 
    -- The silicofluoride chemicals used for fluoridation are contaminated industrial waste and have never been FDA-  approved for human ingestion.
     
    The Environmental Working Group (EWG), a DC watchdog, revealed that a Harvard professor concealed the fluoridation/bone cancer connection for three years. EWG President Ken Cook states, “It is time for the US to recognize that fluoridation has serious risks that far outweigh any minor benefits, and unlike many other environmental issues, it's as easy to end as turning off a valve at the water plant.”
     
    Further, researchers reporting in the Oct 6 2007  British Medical Journal  indicate that fluoridation, touted as a safe cavity preventive, never was proven safe or effective and may be unethical. (1)
     
     
    Many communities rejected or stopped fluoridation over the years. See: http://www.fluoridealert.org/communities.htm

     
    SOURCE:  Fluoride Action Network  
    http://www.FluorideAction.Net

    References:

    (1) “Adding fluoride to water supplies,” British Medical Journal, KK Cheng, Iain Chalmers, Trevor A. Sheldon, October 6, 2007





  • ADA Distributing Misleading Information on Two Federal Fluoride Reports

    The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) charges the American Dental Association (ADA) with
    circulating false and misleading information in its newsletter (8/15) that
    expressed concern over professional "opposition to community water
    fluoridation."(1)

    ADA misrepresented important findings in the 2006 National Research
    Council (NRC)(2) report and trivialized the significance of the dental
    fluorosis epidemic afflicting American children (CDC, 2005).

    "We don't understand why the ADA won't deal honestly with the science
    that caused 600 professionals to urge fluoridation be ended,"(3) says Paul
    Connett, PhD, FAN Director.

    The ADA says the NRC report is not relevant to water fluoridation, but,
    according to its website, made this statement before it had reviewed the
    report. In March, 2006 it wrote: "Additional information will appear on
    ADA.org after the report has been reviewed"(4) but no further information
    has appeared.

    Connett says, "The ADA assessment is totally superficial, in contrast
    to statements from three NRC panel members who wrote important chapters in
    the report."

    Kathleen Thiessen, PhD says, "I have become increasingly convinced that
    deliberate exposure of a large fraction of the U.S. population ... to
    uncontrolled and unmonitored intake of fluoride in their drinking water is
    unwise at best, and probably harmful to a substantial number of people."(5)

    Hardy Limeback, PhD, DDS, writes, " ... it is obvious that the benefit
    of fluoridation is next to nil. ... I am even more convinced that fluoride
    should be banned as a systemic drug (which includes water fluoridation)
    ..."(6)

    Robert L. Isaacson, PhD adds, "The health of the entire country is at
    risk as long as fluoridation of the drinking water remains uncurbed."(6)

    The ADA claims that dental fluorosis, which now impacts 32% of American
    children, is "so slight that only trained professionals can notice it."
    However, very mild fluorosis affects up to 25% of tooth surfaces and mild
    up to 50%(7). The CDC reports that 4% of children have moderate or severe
    fluorosis(8), in which all tooth surfaces are affected, frequently with
    brown staining and sometimes pitting.

    "These categories are easy to identify and can result in psychological
    harm," says Connett. "We urge citizens to sign the ONLINE MESSAGE calling
    for an end to fluoridation and to begin Congressional hearings at:
     
        References:

    (1)
    http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/pubs/adanews/adanewsarticle.asp?articleid=2625

    (2) http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11571

    (3) http://www.fluoridealert.org/statement.august.2007.html

    (4) http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/topics/fluoride_report_response.pdf

    (5) http://www.fluoridealert.org/thiessen-letter.pdf

    (6) http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.quotes.aug.2007.pdf

    (7) http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/facts/fluoridation_facts.pdf

    (8) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/s403a1t23.gif

    SOURCE:  Fluoride Action Network  
    http://www.FluorideAction.Net




  • Fluoridation 101

    Impure, untested and non-required fluoride chemicals are legislated into most U.S. water supplies, not to kill nasty microbes, but to medicate tap water drinkers who are assured water fluoridation is a safe and effective way to prevent tooth decay. But it is neither.

    Water fluoridation is an old-fashioned concept. It is dentistry's continued goal for every American's faucet to dispense 1 milligram fluoride via approximately one quart of water. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) tells us that 2/3 of Americans receive fluoridated tap water. Virtually 100% eat and drink a fluoridated food supply.

    Fluoridation, shockingly, is not supported by valid science.

    Dentists mistakenly believed swallowed fluoride created decay resistant teeth by becoming part of children's developing enamel; but they were wrong. Fluoride's beneficial effects, if any, are topical according to the CDC and the American Dental Association.

    Public health officials predicted fluoride would eradicate tooth decay like vaccines prevent disease; but they were wrong about that, too. They said fluoride was a necessary nutrient and, like vitamin C prevents scurvy, fluoride would prevent tooth decay - wrong again.

    The US Surgeon General reports tooth decay is at epidemic proportions among our poor and minority populations, many of whom live in fluoridated communities . While, tooth decay is increasing in US children , the United Kingdom reports an 11% cavity decline in a recent survey and a 15% decline in a previous survey. The UK is only 10% fluoridated and provides low-fluoride children's toothpaste. Only high-dose fluoride toothpaste is available in the U.S. - twice the dosage of the UK's children's fluoridated toothpates.

    In fact, non-water-fluoridated Finland, Sweden and Holland cut tooth decay rates by 92%, 82% and 72% respectively over the past 20 years. While in the super-fluoride saturated U.S., public health dentists only managed to cut rates by 50% over the same period (since 1984).

    Fluoride supplements are prescribed to children from communities that won't or can't fluoridate their water supply. With outdated and scientifically invalid scientific support, dentists say swallowing l milligram fluoride daily reduces tooth decay without fluoride's adverse effects such as dental fluorosis but they are even wrong about that.

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) never approved fluoride ingestion. They were "grandfathered" in before the FDA drug testing laws were enacted. New research shows that children who consume fluoride tablets are more at risk for dental fluorosis. That's why routine fluoride supplementation is no longer recommended by the Canadian Dental Association, the Western Australian Health Authority's Dental Section and the German Scientific Dental Association. And, because of health concerns, Belgium banned the sale of fluoride supplements to prevent tooth decay.

    Dental Fluorosis is the only outward sign of fluoride's toxicity to the rest of the body.

    Astonishingly, research now shows swallowing fluoride is virtually useless and has unnecessarily exposed millions of Americans to fluoride's adverse side effects such as bone disease and dental fluorosis - white spotted, yellow or brown stained and sometimes pitted and crumbly teeth - which has, not so surprisingly, increased dramatically in American children.(above picture is moderate dental fluorosis).

    The Acadeny of General Dentistry and many researchers recommends non-fluoridated water be used to prepare infant formula and foods, to avoid dental fluorosis.

    November 2006, the American Dental Association quietly advised their members that fluoridated water mixed into concentrated infant formula increases the child's risk of dental fluorosis and should be avoided. Then the Centers for Disease Control put the same advisory on their website but didn't issue an alert or press release to inform the public.

    A few media outlets aired the information including WKRN-TV in Tennessee.

    Lack of fluoride does not cause tooth decay. Poor diet does. Fluoride cannot fix a poor diet. But fluoride can and does ruin children's teeth. And no American is or ever was fluoride-deficient.

    Some studies show that cavity levels decline after water fluoridation stops. Ironically, African Americans have the most tooth decay and the most dental fluorosis.

    There's evidence that fluoride actually causes tooth decay at levels slightly over "optimal."

    In fact, dental fluorosis has gotten so bad that some dental experts, such as Dr. Hardy Limeback,say that it costs more to repair teeth damaged by fluoride than would have been saved if water fluoridation actually reduced tooth decay.

    In 2004, one dentist charged $18,000 to cover a 16-year-olds white-laced fluoride-damaged teeth with veneers and caps.

    HOW WE GOT INTO THIS MESS

    At the turn of the last century, many residents of the Southwest US had unusually ugly teeth. They called it "Colorado Brown Stain." Dental researchers sought to discover the source of this disfiguring tooth malformation. The culprit was high levels of fluoride in the water. We've been told for years that these ugly teeth resisted decay but a recently discovered book (April 2004)via the internet gives conflicting details.

    Only 28.5% of 12- to 14-year-olds were cavity-free in Colorado Springs, Colorado, with 2.6 ppm naturally fluoridated water, 75% had fluorosis, according to a 1948 study ("Fluorine in Drinking Water Its Effect on Dental Caries," by Francis A. Arnold).

    Also, Hereford, Texas, was touted as the "town without a toothache" because high levels of natural water fluoride discolored the townfolk's teeth but, we were told, they didn't have any or few cavities. However, 12 to 14-year-olds living in Hereford, Texas, where the water was naturally fluoridated at 3.1 ppm, 100% had dental fluorosis; but only 38% were caries free.

    These statistics are not impressive.

    But maybe they were better than other cities without fluoride or calcium, dentists and/or sound nutrition.

    But that didn't stop well-meaning but misguided dentists (who probably didn't, and still don't, read the actual studies )to assume the fluoride also caused the discolored teeth allegedly to resist decay. However, what they overlooked is significant. The water supply was also very high in calcium and magnesium, essential nutrients we now know makes teeth strong.

    Also the population studied in Colorado Springs was healthy and wealthy, which drew dentists from the East striving to make their own fortune. At the same time, poor residents of Appalachia in the East were losing teeth to decay without any dentist around to treat them which is still the case today

    In another highly unbelievable move, the dentists convinced public health people to experiment with this new fluoride "discovery." They hypothesized that, if natural fluoride (calcium fluoride) in drinking water makes teeth resist decay, let's totally ingnore calcium (and the gereral health of people with great teeth), and see if adding artificial fluoride to a town's water makes any difference or will make people sick.

    So they used all the people in a few cities like Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Newburgh, New York, as their guinea pigs. In Newburgh, they added sodium fluoride into the water supply in 1945 and left Kingston unfluoridated to act as the control.

    Of course, researchers declared fluoridation a success after only five years, even though the teeth of the children born into the experiment had not even erupted yet. They said fluoride was safe because they examined school children who weren't sick two weeks before the examination date - virtually eliminating the very children who may have been made ill by the fluoride. Adults were never examined for ill effects.

    Ten years later, the State University of New York found that children in fluoridated Newburgh had more cortical bone defects and higher rates of hemoglob anemia. Kingston never fluoridated. Recent studies show tooth decay and dental fluorosis is higher in fluoridated Newburgh.

    And what's even more perverse is that the chemical used to fluoridate your drinking water is an industrial waste product that, along with fluoride, carries lead, arsenic, and other contaminants to a faucet near you.

    The silicofluorides have never been safety tested in animals or humans. With the American children as guinea pigs, researchers find that silicofluorides increase children's lead absorption and higher blood lead levels are linked to more tooth decay. And the U.S. National Toxicology Program is just beginning to study silicofluorides for human ingestion some 50 plus years after it's been dumped into most Americans drinking water.

    Other studies link fluoride to bone fractures, lowered IQ, thyroid disfunction and more.

    Fluoridation has provided a lucrative sector for researchers to apply for federal grants to study the after effects of the crazy decision to put fluoride into humans' water supply and then see what happens.

    US children are overdosed with fluoride whether rich or poor, healthy or malnourished from various sources. You would think dentists would heed the advice reported in their dental journals - to cut back on fluoride use. But instead dentists are lobbying legislators all over the US to fluoridate more water supplies - even when the people have voted against it. But educated individuals are fighting back. In the past two elections, fluoridation failed miserably in the polls.

    Meanwhile, the American Dental Association reported to the press on June 16, 2000 that they have a new cavity fighting tool - calcium. January 2006, researchers tout Cavistat, a calcium containing nutrient substance that reduces cavities better than fluoride and without fluoride.

    And, instead of putting themselves out of business as they once predicted, today’s dentists make much more money than physicians while working less days and less hours.

    WHAT YOU CAN DO: Write your legislators. Tell them you want fluoridation stopped on the local, state and federal levels. Find out who represents you here  Find out who represents you in New Hampshire here:

    Ask the presidential candidates about fluoridation during their NH campaign stops 

This Blog


  Print This Page  |  Email This Page  |  Make Us Your Homepage!
User Agreement  |  Privacy Policy  |  © 2006 The Union Leader Corporation  |  Powered by SilverTech