|
|
Scientific Evidence Shows How and Why
-
Fluoride: A Pain in the Neck - Case
Report A 52-year-old American (New York) man’s arthritic-like joint pain
and immobility went away after he stopped brushing his teeth with fluoridated
toothpaste, according to a study in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
(1). There’s no scientific dispute that large fluoride doses cause
crippling skeletal fluorosis over time. (See. http://www.nalgonda.org/fluorosis/victims.htm)
But, “less well-known causes of chronic fluoride toxicity include fluoride
supplements, certain teas and wine and some toothpastes,” report researchers
Kurland, et al. (1) Skeletal fluorosis often results in abnormal bone
hardening and thickening (osteosclerosis) with painful and impaired neck and
spine mobility, spine curvature, and/or painful lower extremities ultimately
causing crippling and incapacitation, report the researchers. In this
case, the only obvious fluoride exposure was toothpaste. The patient drank no
fluoridated water, tea or wine; had no occupational fluoride exposure; did not
chew tobacco, inhale snuff, cook with Teflon pots, use fluoridated mouthwash or
get fluoride treatments at twice-yearly dentist visits. But he brushed before
and after all meals (minimum 6 times daily) with fluoridated
toothpaste. Fluoride was elevated in his serum, urine and iliac crest
(bone), the researchers report. Within 8 months of eliminating all
obvious fluoride sources, the patient’s urinary and blood fluoride levels
dropped and bone function markers showed clear cut improvement, the researchers
report. “By approximately two years after diagnosis and apparent
elimination of excess fluoride exposure, the patient had complete resolution of
his neck immobility and no longer required analgesics,” the researchers
write. Roos, et al. documents a woman whose painful swollen fingers
healed after she ceased eating fluoridated toothpaste.(2) Whyte, et al.
report a woman’s fluoride-caused debilitating joint pains disappeared when her
two-gallon-a-day iced tea habit stopped.(3) Eichmiller, et al. report a
patient’s leg and joint pains from a dentist-prescribed high-concentration
fluoride product.(4)
Osteoarthritis is linked to water fluoride in a Turkish
study.(6)
A 2009 Brazilian study shows that, after brushing with a
fluoridated dentifrice, a substantial amount of fluoride is ingested by
children. (7)
“Fluoride at any level accumulates in the body,” says Paul Beeber,
President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. “So even water
fluoridation will cause arthritic-like symptoms in susceptible individuals which
is compounded by U.S. physicians’and dentists' lack of training to diagnose
fluoride toxicity.” (See: http://tinyurl.com/Susheela
“We know US schoolchildren are fluoride-overdosed (5).
What’s it doing to their bones?” asks Beeber.
(4) Journal of the American Dental Association, "Controlling
the fluoride dosage in a patient with compromised salivary function,"
Frederick C. Eichmiller, D.D.S.; Naomi Eidelman, Ph.D.; Clifton M.
Carey, PhD., Vol. 136, page 67 -70, January 2005 http://jada.ada.org/cgi/content/full/136/1/67 NYSCOF News Release: http://tinyurl.com/mbrmd (5) NYSCOF News
release http://tinyurl.com/mbrmd about U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office of Communication, 8/25/05
(6)
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/newyorkstatecoalitionopposedtofluoridation/_pgg7.php3
(7) Rev Esp Salud Publica 2009 May-Jun;83(3):415-25. [Demonstration of fluoride systemic
absorption secondary to toothbrushing with fluoride dentifrice in
children]
|
-
Over 1,700 professionals signed a statement urging Congress to
stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted. They cite
new scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay,
is ineffective and has serious health risks. (http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html) Signers include a Nobel
Prize winner, three members of the prestigious 2006 National Research Council
(NRC) panel that reported on fluoride’s toxicology, two officers in the Union
representing professionals at EPA headquarters, the President of the
International Society of Doctors for the Environment, and hundreds of medical,
dental, academic, scientific and environmental professionals,
worldwide. Signer Dr. Arvid Carlsson, winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize for
Medicine, says, “Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology.
It's really obsolete.” An Online Action Petition to Congress in support
of the Professionals' Statement is available on FAN's web site, http://congress.fluorideaction.net and over
11,000 individuals have signed so far. “The NRC report dramatically
changed scientific understanding of fluoride's health risks," says Paul Connett,
PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network. "Government officials who
continue to promote fluoridation must testify under oath as to why they are
ignoring the powerful evidence of harm in the NRC report,” he
added. The Professionals’ Statement also references: -- The
new American Dental Association policy recommending infant formula NOT be
prepared with fluoridated water. -- The CDC’s concession that the
predominant benefit of fluoride is topical not systemic. -- CDC data showing
that dental fluorosis, caused by fluoride over-exposure, now impacts one third
of American children. -- Major research indicating little difference in decay
rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities. -- A Harvard study
indicating a possible link between fluoridation and bone cancer. -- The
silicofluoride chemicals used for fluoridation are contaminated industrial waste
and have never been FDA- approved for human ingestion. The
Environmental Working Group (EWG), a DC watchdog, revealed that a Harvard
professor concealed the fluoridation/bone cancer connection for three years. EWG
President Ken Cook states, “It is time for the US to recognize that fluoridation
has serious risks that far outweigh any minor benefits, and unlike many other
environmental issues, it's as easy to end as turning off a valve at the water
plant.”
Further, researchers reporting in the Oct 6 2007 British Medical Journal indicate that
fluoridation, touted as a safe cavity preventive, never was proven safe or
effective and may be unethical. (1)
References:
(1) “Adding fluoride to water
supplies,” British Medical Journal,
KK Cheng, Iain Chalmers, Trevor A. Sheldon, October 6,
2007
|
-
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) charges the American Dental Association (ADA) with circulating false and misleading information in its newsletter (8/15) that expressed concern over professional "opposition to community water fluoridation."(1) ADA misrepresented important findings in the 2006 National Research Council (NRC)(2) report and trivialized the significance of the dental fluorosis epidemic afflicting American children (CDC, 2005).
"We don't understand why the ADA won't deal honestly with the science that caused 600 professionals to urge fluoridation be ended,"(3) says Paul Connett, PhD, FAN Director.
The ADA says the NRC report is not relevant to water fluoridation, but, according to its website, made this statement before it had reviewed the report. In March, 2006 it wrote: "Additional information will appear on ADA.org after the report has been reviewed"(4) but no further information has appeared.
Connett says, "The ADA assessment is totally superficial, in contrast to statements from three NRC panel members who wrote important chapters in the report."
Kathleen Thiessen, PhD says, "I have become increasingly convinced that deliberate exposure of a large fraction of the U.S. population ... to uncontrolled and unmonitored intake of fluoride in their drinking water is unwise at best, and probably harmful to a substantial number of people."(5)
Hardy Limeback, PhD, DDS, writes, " ... it is obvious that the benefit of fluoridation is next to nil. ... I am even more convinced that fluoride should be banned as a systemic drug (which includes water fluoridation) ..."(6)
Robert L. Isaacson, PhD adds, "The health of the entire country is at risk as long as fluoridation of the drinking water remains uncurbed."(6)
The ADA claims that dental fluorosis, which now impacts 32% of American children, is "so slight that only trained professionals can notice it." However, very mild fluorosis affects up to 25% of tooth surfaces and mild up to 50%(7). The CDC reports that 4% of children have moderate or severe fluorosis(8), in which all tooth surfaces are affected, frequently with brown staining and sometimes pitting.
"These categories are easy to identify and can result in psychological harm," says Connett. "We urge citizens to sign the ONLINE MESSAGE calling for an end to fluoridation and to begin Congressional hearings at:
References: (1) http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/pubs/adanews/adanewsarticle.asp?articleid=2625
(2) http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11571
(3) http://www.fluoridealert.org/statement.august.2007.html
(4) http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/topics/fluoride_report_response.pdf
(5) http://www.fluoridealert.org/thiessen-letter.pdf
(6) http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.quotes.aug.2007.pdf
(7) http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/facts/fluoridation_facts.pdf
(8) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/figures/s403a1t23.gif
|
-
Impure, untested and non-required fluoride chemicals
are legislated into most U.S. water supplies, not to kill nasty
microbes, but to medicate tap water drinkers who are assured water
fluoridation is a safe and effective way to prevent tooth decay. But it is neither.
Water fluoridation is an old-fashioned concept. It is dentistry's
continued goal for every American's faucet to dispense 1 milligram
fluoride via approximately one quart of water. The Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) tells us that 2/3 of Americans receive fluoridated tap
water. Virtually 100% eat and drink a fluoridated food supply.
Fluoridation, shockingly, is not supported by valid science.
Dentists mistakenly believed swallowed fluoride created decay resistant
teeth by becoming part of children's developing enamel; but they were
wrong. Fluoride's beneficial effects, if any, are topical according to the CDC and the American Dental Association.
Public health officials predicted fluoride would eradicate tooth decay
like vaccines prevent disease; but they were wrong about that, too.
They said fluoride was a necessary nutrient and, like vitamin C
prevents scurvy, fluoride would prevent tooth decay - wrong again.
The US Surgeon General reports tooth decay is at epidemic proportions among our poor and minority populations, many of whom live in fluoridated communities . While, tooth decay is increasing in US children ,
the United Kingdom reports an 11% cavity decline in a recent survey and
a 15% decline in a previous survey. The UK is only 10% fluoridated and
provides low-fluoride children's toothpaste. Only high-dose fluoride
toothpaste is available in the U.S. - twice the dosage of the UK's
children's fluoridated toothpates.
In fact, non-water-fluoridated Finland, Sweden and Holland cut tooth
decay rates by 92%, 82% and 72% respectively over the past 20 years.
While in the super-fluoride saturated U.S., public health dentists only
managed to cut rates by 50% over the same period (since 1984).
Fluoride supplements
are prescribed to children from communities that won't or can't
fluoridate their water supply. With outdated and scientifically invalid
scientific support, dentists say swallowing l milligram fluoride daily
reduces tooth decay without fluoride's adverse effects such as dental
fluorosis but they are even wrong about that.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) never approved fluoride ingestion.
They were "grandfathered" in before the FDA drug testing laws were
enacted. New research shows that children who consume fluoride tablets
are more at risk for dental fluorosis. That's why routine fluoride
supplementation is no longer recommended by the Canadian Dental
Association, the Western Australian Health Authority's Dental Section
and the German Scientific Dental Association. And, because of health
concerns, Belgium banned the sale of fluoride supplements to prevent
tooth decay.
Dental Fluorosis is the only outward sign of fluoride's toxicity to the rest of the body.
Astonishingly, research now shows swallowing fluoride is virtually useless
and has unnecessarily exposed millions of Americans to fluoride's
adverse side effects such as bone disease and dental fluorosis - white
spotted, yellow or brown stained and sometimes pitted and crumbly teeth
- which has, not so surprisingly, increased dramatically in American children.(above picture is moderate dental fluorosis).
The Acadeny of General Dentistry and many researchers recommends non-fluoridated water be used to prepare infant formula and foods, to avoid dental fluorosis.
November 2006, the American Dental Association
quietly advised their members that fluoridated water mixed into
concentrated infant formula increases the child's risk of dental
fluorosis and should be avoided. Then the Centers for Disease Control put the same advisory on their website but didn't issue an alert or press release to inform the public.
A few media outlets aired the information including WKRN-TV in Tennessee.
Lack of fluoride does not cause tooth decay. Poor diet does. Fluoride cannot fix a poor diet. But fluoride can and does ruin children's teeth. And no American is or ever was fluoride-deficient.
Some studies show that cavity levels decline after water fluoridation stops. Ironically, African Americans have the most tooth decay
and the most dental fluorosis.
There's evidence that fluoride actually causes tooth decay at levels slightly over "optimal."
In fact, dental fluorosis has gotten so bad that some dental experts, such as Dr. Hardy Limeback,say
that it costs more to repair teeth damaged by fluoride than would have
been saved if water fluoridation actually reduced tooth decay.
In 2004, one dentist charged $18,000 to cover a 16-year-olds white-laced fluoride-damaged teeth with veneers and caps.
HOW WE GOT INTO THIS MESS
At the turn of the last century, many residents of the Southwest US had
unusually ugly teeth. They called it "Colorado Brown Stain." Dental
researchers sought to discover the source of this disfiguring tooth
malformation. The culprit was high levels of fluoride in the water.
We've been told for years that these ugly teeth resisted decay but a
recently discovered book (April 2004)via the internet gives conflicting
details.
Only 28.5% of 12- to 14-year-olds were cavity-free in Colorado Springs,
Colorado, with 2.6 ppm naturally fluoridated water, 75% had fluorosis,
according to a 1948 study ("Fluorine in Drinking Water Its Effect on
Dental Caries," by Francis A. Arnold).
Also, Hereford, Texas, was touted as the "town without a toothache"
because high levels of natural water fluoride discolored the townfolk's
teeth but, we were told, they didn't have any or few cavities. However,
12 to 14-year-olds living in Hereford, Texas, where the water was
naturally fluoridated at 3.1 ppm, 100% had dental fluorosis; but only
38% were caries free.
These statistics are not impressive.
But maybe they were better than other cities without fluoride or calcium, dentists and/or sound nutrition.
But that didn't stop well-meaning but misguided dentists (who probably
didn't, and still don't, read the actual studies )to assume the
fluoride also caused the discolored teeth allegedly to resist decay.
However, what they overlooked is significant. The water supply was also
very high in calcium and magnesium, essential nutrients we now know
makes teeth strong.
Also the population studied in Colorado Springs was healthy and
wealthy, which drew dentists from the East striving to make their own
fortune. At the same time, poor residents of Appalachia in the East
were losing teeth to decay without any dentist around to treat them
which is still the case today
In another highly unbelievable move, the dentists convinced public
health people to experiment with this new fluoride "discovery." They
hypothesized that, if natural fluoride (calcium fluoride) in drinking
water makes teeth resist decay, let's totally ingnore calcium (and the
gereral health of people with great teeth), and see if adding
artificial fluoride to a town's water makes any difference or will make
people sick.
So they used all the people in a few cities like Grand Rapids,
Michigan, and Newburgh, New York, as their guinea pigs. In Newburgh,
they added sodium fluoride into the water supply in 1945 and left
Kingston unfluoridated to act as the control.
Of course, researchers declared fluoridation a success after only five
years, even though the teeth of the children born into the experiment
had not even erupted yet. They said fluoride was safe because they
examined school children who weren't sick two weeks before the
examination date - virtually eliminating the very children who may have
been made ill by the fluoride. Adults were never examined for ill
effects.
Ten years later, the State University of New York found that
children in fluoridated Newburgh had more cortical bone defects and
higher rates of hemoglob anemia. Kingston never fluoridated. Recent
studies show tooth decay and dental fluorosis is higher in fluoridated
Newburgh.
And what's even more perverse is that the chemical used to fluoridate
your drinking water is an industrial waste product that, along with
fluoride, carries lead, arsenic, and other contaminants to a faucet
near you.
The silicofluorides have never been safety tested in animals or humans.
With the American children as guinea pigs, researchers find that
silicofluorides increase children's lead absorption and higher blood
lead levels are linked to more tooth decay. And the U.S. National
Toxicology Program is just beginning to study silicofluorides for human
ingestion some 50 plus years after it's been dumped into most Americans
drinking water.
Other studies link fluoride to bone fractures, lowered IQ, thyroid disfunction and more.
Fluoridation has provided a lucrative sector for researchers to apply
for federal grants to study the after effects of the crazy decision to
put fluoride into humans' water supply and then see what happens.
US children are overdosed with fluoride whether rich or poor, healthy
or malnourished from various sources. You would think dentists would
heed the advice reported in their dental journals - to cut back on
fluoride use. But instead dentists are lobbying legislators all over
the US to fluoridate more water supplies - even when the people have
voted against it. But educated individuals are fighting back. In the
past two elections, fluoridation failed miserably in the polls.
Meanwhile, the American Dental Association reported to the press on
June 16, 2000 that they have a new cavity fighting tool - calcium.
January 2006, researchers tout Cavistat, a calcium containing nutrient
substance that reduces cavities better than fluoride and without
fluoride.
And, instead of putting themselves out of business as they once predicted, today’s dentists make much more money than physicians while working less days and less hours.
WHAT YOU CAN DO: Write your legislators. Tell them you want
fluoridation stopped on the local, state and federal levels. Find out
who represents you here Find out who represents you in New Hampshire here:
Ask the presidential candidates about fluoridation during their NH campaign stops
|
|
|
|