<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bow News : PSNH</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/PSNH/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: PSNH</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>Air Resources Council member asked to step down</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/2009/11/11/Air-Resources-Council-member-asked-to-step-down.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:16718</guid><dc:creator>Goffstown Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/comments/16718.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=16718</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;font size="1"&gt;By &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:Danobrien155@hotmail.com"&gt;&lt;font size="1"&gt;Dan O&amp;rsquo;Brien&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;A group challenging the installation of a turbine at Public Service of New Hampshire&amp;rsquo;s Merrimack Transfer Station has called for a board member overseeing the case to step down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Sierra Club said Raymond Donald, the acting chairman of the Air Resources Council, was a former employee of the Seabrook Station nuclear power plant, which was partially owned by PSNH.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;We found out through a financial disclosure form that Ray Donald had a relationship with Seabrook Station, so we filed a motion to disqualify him,&amp;rdquo; said Cathy Corkery, chapter director of the New Hampshire Sierra Club. &amp;ldquo;We reminded PSNH lawyers they have a responsibility of candor.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Merrimack Transfer Station is undergoing a $457 million overhaul. The project upset residents in nearby Pembroke when a 445-foot tower, also known as a scrubber, was constructed last summer with little notification to residents. PSNH defended the allegation, saying it contacted all the town boards required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Sierra Club said it&amp;rsquo;s concerned that the new turbine could release more pollutants that allowed under law, alleging that it was built without proper permits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Corkery says the discovery of Donald&amp;rsquo;s former employer was made last week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;We do not have confidence in the council&amp;rsquo;s ability to hear this fairly,&amp;rdquo; she said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A decision on the issue could be made at some point this week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16718" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/Bow/default.aspx">Bow</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/PSNH/default.aspx">PSNH</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/Merrimack+Transfer+Station/default.aspx">Merrimack Transfer Station</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/Air+Resources+Council/default.aspx">Air Resources Council</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/turbine/default.aspx">turbine</category></item><item><title>Power plant upgrade may get second look</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/2009/01/14/Power-plant-upgrade-may-get-second-look.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:12494</guid><dc:creator>Goffstown Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/comments/12494.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=12494</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;font face="NimbusSanL-BoldCond" size="1"&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;BY &lt;a href="mailto:mschooley@yourneighborhoodnews.com"&gt;MATT SCHOOLEY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;Sen. Harold Janeway has filed a bill that he hopes will force the Public Utilities Commission to review a planned upgrade on PSNH&amp;rsquo;s Bow coal power plant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Janeway filed the bill on Monday, Jan. 12, hours before the 4 p.m. deadline, and will now look to overturn the PUC&amp;rsquo;s decision that it would not look into the project because lawmakers already decided it was in the best interest of the state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The $457 million upgrade includes a scrubber that is designed to cut emissions of mercury after the Legislature mandated the environmental regulation in 2006.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, since regulation was passed, the cost of the project has increased significantly, one of the reasons behind Janeway&amp;rsquo;s bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;The investment deserves careful analysis,&amp;rdquo; said Janeway. &amp;ldquo;So much has changed in the energy and utility area in the past two or three years and the cost of the project has roughly doubled since that action was taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Janeway also said the state is at a crossroads between the old way that the industry operated and the new way, and it is time to look closely at the use of fossil fuels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;It doesn&amp;rsquo;t seem sensible to me to commit to a $450 million investment based on what was common knowledge when the bill was passed,&amp;rdquo; said Janeway. &amp;ldquo;You wouldn&amp;rsquo;t do that when you make other investments, you consider all the conditions that prevail.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The upgrade would be paid for by ratepayers, and recently a group of businesses that had asked the PUC to look at the project filed an appeal with the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the bill filed, Janeway knows he has work ahead of him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I can&amp;rsquo;t predict the outcome,&amp;rdquo; said Janeway. &amp;ldquo;There&amp;rsquo;s a lot of persuading to be done because it&amp;rsquo;s revisiting something a lot of people would prefer not be revisited. We have an obligation to give it another go and go over it again.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the bill passes, Janeway said he doesn&amp;rsquo;t want the review to take up years and resources, but a quick-paced, thorough review. In the end, Janeway hopes to find a solution best for both sides.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;We want to end up with something fair and right to the company, and to the stakeholders,&amp;rdquo; said Janeway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12494" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/Bow/default.aspx">Bow</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/power+plant/default.aspx">power plant</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bow_editor/archive/tags/PSNH/default.aspx">PSNH</category></item></channel></rss>