NewHampshire.com logo   Search NewHampshire.com The homepage for New Hampshire
Welcome to NewHampshire.com Communities Sign in | Join | Help

Bow Times

News and Information for the Town of Bow

Meeting causes strife, name calling among Bow selectmen

BY MATT SCHOOLEY

Weeks after Bow selectmen voted to keep the Celebrating Children preschool a town-supported program, town members and officials are divided over alleged bigotry and political misunderstanding.

During the Nov. 28 meeting, about 75 supporters showed up to tell selectmen why they do not believe the school should be asked to switch to a privately funded organization. Among the supporters were three former Celebrating Children students, now at Bow Elementary School, who read cards saying how the preschool helped them.

Selectman Tom Keane, who questioned during the meeting if the school should remain town funded, voiced his opinion through a letter to the editor in The Bow Times on Dec. 13.

“I was extremely disappointed to find that there was no tolerance whatsoever for a discussion of which organizational status would maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of this quality program,” Keane said in the letter. “Most disturbing was the use of three young minority siblings to read scripted notes on how valuable the preschool was to their lives.”

Fellow Selectman Harry Judd responded with a letter of his own on Dec. 20, with harsh words for Keane.

“I am writing to assure the citizens of Bow that racism and bigotry will never be considered in setting policy by the Board of Selectmen,” he began his letter. “Tom, you may have found that ‘most disturbing,’ but the rest of the selectmen viewed it as yet another example of the community participation and tolerance that makes Bow a wonderful place to live.”

Residents have since written letters to the editor on both sides of the argument, with resident Brad Hutton saying in the Jan. 10 issue, “H.T. Judd should resign immediately as a Bow selectman.

His attack on Tom Keane is out of character for a person representing the town.”

Keane said he didn’t intend for race to be the main issue of his statement, as in the past he worked to set up a program that helps minority families. He has an issue, hoewever, awith any adult using any children at meetings to gain favor.

“In general, I’m always disappointed when adults use children for political purposes, no matter the issue,” said Keane.

“Those are discussions adults should have and voice opinions on. In this case they were reading from cards, and I felt badly they were being used by adults.”

Judd said he was glad to see younger residents taking part in the meeting.

“We should encourage all residents to participate. Particularly we should encourage young people to be part of the community, speak up and be heard,” he said. “We’ve had young people give presentations and I think it’s terrific they choose to participate.”

Board Chairman Leon Kenison said the disagreement has not yet come to a point where he foresees himself stepping in.

“I found some of (Tom Keane’s) writing to be somewhat offensive, and Harry Judd obviously did as well. I think, frankly, some people have missed the point,” he said. “We try to be as civil as we can be. We don’t need fist-pounding, stomping or anything because that’s when the system breaks down. I keep the peace and I’m not rushing in to write an opinion. Hopefully, I can keep a neutral posture and the people on right and left can be respectful.”

Keane does not see the issue becoming a problem at future meetings.

“It’s unfortunate and unnecessary that it happened. Our job is to represent the best interests of the citizens of Bow. It’s not the end of the world. Some of it is nasty politics as usual,” said Keane.

Judd and Keane have not yet spoken about the issue, though Judd said he would welcome such a conversation.

“Anytime, pick the time and place and I’d be happy to discuss racism and citizen rights. I would be happy to discuss any issues with him,” he said.

A meeting may be necessary between the two, Keane said. “I don’t know. I’d have to think about (having a conversation about the disagreement with Judd). If there’s an opportunity, I’ll say something to him.

If he really believes I am a racist and bigot, then we really do need to have a conversation,” he said. “If it’s politics, then it’s just politics. I’m big boy and I can move on with it. But if he believes those things then there is a problem.”

Published Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:17 PM by Bow Editor

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Rich said:

The program couldn't have helped those kids all that much if they had to read prepared statments instead of explaining how the program helped them in their own words..
January 11, 2008 10:41 AM
 

Fight4Bow said:

Bravo to Brad Hutton for saying, in his Jan. 10 letter to the editor that “H.T. Judd should resign immediately as a Bow selectman. Brad is right on, Judd has made a fool out of himself for his obvious attempt to practice the politics of personal destruction. Judd should resign but first apologize to the Town of Bow and to Selectman Keane. I think Bow Times reporter Matt Schoolee reporter has uncovered some more issues with our selectmen by getting Board Chairman Leon Kenison quoted as saying “I found some of (Tom Keane’s) writing to be somewhat offensive.” Mr. Kenison what was offensive about what Keane said? I would like to know in detail. Chairman Kenison’s equating what Judd wrote to what Keane wrote is simply unconscionable! It is like blaming the young girl who wore short shorts for being raped. I found her short shorts to be somewhat offensive, and the rape obviously did as well. I think Chairman Kenison isn’t offended by what Keane wrote but by having his “good old boy club” broken up by Keane. Perhaps the rest of Bow should follow Charman Kenison’s hyper-sensitive lead. Perhaps we could watch Kenison very closely and see if there is anything that offends us. I am sure it won’t take too long.
January 11, 2008 2:43 PM
 

Bob O said:

I think the Bow Times got it right in their 1/10 editorial when they narrowed the very inflammatory and baseless charge of racism down to 2 arguments and they are:

If the three children who spoke in favor of the school were coerced in what to say, shame on their parents or guardians for letting it happen.

If the fourth-graders came before the board on their own, we congratulate them for becoming involved.

The prepared statements gave the appearance that the children were coerced and that was the basis of concern from one of our selectmen.  Harry Judd’s argument that the children should be congratulated if they came on their own is also valid but Judd’s very inflammatory and baseless charge of racism has absolutely no validity at all.  Harry Judd has a long history in Bow of partisanship and his actions of trying to destroy the character of fellow selectmen is shameless.

Let’s look at the facts and see if Judd is abusing his position of selectmen and practicing the politics of personal destruction and what would be his motive to destroy the character of a fellow selectman:  

The selectman who Judd tried (and failed) to destroyed,  defeated Judd’s political friend in his race for selectman.  Judd went through the unusual act of using his title of selectman to endorse his political friend.  Lets also look at the another motive for Judd to assassinate another selectmen’s character. This observation was noted by a Bow Times letter to the editor writer.  The writer noted that Judd saw Keane as a threat because he ran against Judd’s wife for State Rep.

Now I think the Bow Times is wrong in one aspect and that was noted in Fight4Bow’s comments:  you can not equate the horrendous thing what Judd did to Keane’s innocent comments.  I think the Bow Times should encourage the selectmen to get back to work but they also should be pushing for Judd’s resignation or at least an written apology (and that isn’t enough).  The Bow Times made it seem that both Judd and Keane were wrong and that is far from the truth.  

To whoever writes the Bow Times editorials please put yourself in Keane’s shoes how would you like to have your character assassinated by being called a racist, bigot, and xenophobe?  I bet you would think that would be a very serious charge.  

January 12, 2008 4:04 PM
 

Mike said:

It seems  that guys like Harry would well advised to think twice before carelessly making extreme accusations.  Then again, when you’re simply “firing for effect”, I suppose it doesn’t really matter if what you say is true.  All that matters is whether or not someone will believe your emotionally charged claim.  From what I’ve seen and read of Mr. Keane, he is an honorable man in every respect.  His concern regarding the possible exploitation of a child’s race for political purposes should be a concern to all of us.  Whether or not that was the explicit intent in the case he references is not clear to me.  However, I certainly don’t object to someone asking the question, and neither should anyone else.  All Americans are minorities in one respect or another.  We are obligated as citizens not to use differences in heritage to leverage either advantage or disadvantage over one another.  And while we’re at it, let us not bow so deeply to the gods of political correctness that words like “minority” cannot be used (in good faith) without causing offense.  We must face the reality that human nature has not changed over the course of history.  As a result, we are forever obligated to challenge our commitment to core American values of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all, without using race, creed or religion as a special mitigating factor.  Mr. Keane has evidently accepted that challenge, and Harry apparently fears it.

January 12, 2008 6:39 PM
 

Coach said:

I think that we have to watch very closely as to who we vote for. Harry Judd's record as selectmen does not match his rhetoric when he campaigned for office. Selectman Keane ran as someone who was going to look for ways to keep Bow’s Taxes down and he has been true to form. So Bow, do we want to reelect a selectmen who will say anything to stay in office or do we want to go to the support of the one who is true to his word? Coach
January 13, 2008 9:32 AM
 

Ed Prisby said:

Most disturbing was the use of three young minority siblings to read scripted notes on how valuable the preschool was to their lives.
Why did the statement read "minority siblings?" That they were minorities isn't relevant to Keane's point. It seems to me he injected race into the discussion. If he'd said, "colored kids," it would have been a straight-up problem. But he didn't. Barely, it seems. That's not being sensitive. That's being able to read.
January 16, 2008 2:23 PM
 

racerric said:

WOW … Mr. Harold T. Judd!! You have really outdone yourself here on your soap box. I read with great dismay your letter to the editor titled, “Racism has absolutely no place in public discourse” but did you actually check beforehand with the rest of the Selectmen before you began your pompous tirade of rhetoric, posturing, extreme accusations, showmanship, or just being a good bleeding heart liberal who gets off on extreme partisan politics and bigger is better government with more spending?? You preach tolerance in your pompous letter but we have had to show a great deal of tolerance for you since you moved to Bow. Get over it Mr. Judd and stop sounding like Al and Jesse or Clinton and Obama. Get back to the real issue here of whether or not Celebrating Children “pre-school”, a private not-for-profit child day care business being disguised as a pre-school, should be financed within the Bow municipal budget. If it is a legitimate “pre-school” shouldn’t it be under the SAU/School District budget and their authority instead of a Recreation Department program? I do not think anyone has a problem with the program itself as a child day care business or even a “pre-school” or its quality. The problem is why is this business operating under the Town umbrella and budget? Who is responsible for including it within the Town budget? Does that person have the authority to do this or is this person just trying to build their piece of the kingdom? What is going to happen if the employees of this child day care want Town benefits and raises? What is the liability exposure to the Town? Under whose authority does this child day care/”pre-school” operate? Is this a true recreation or Town function? Is it a new Town Department? Was it even a legal business entity registered in NH before the Town took it under its wing? Had it filed income tax returns or 990 returns? Did it have an EIN? How long before the Town took it under its wing did it actually operate? Was it paying wages throughout its entire duration of operation? I think these were the true questions that Selectmen Keane was trying to bring to light along with getting the budgets & current trend of absurd spending under control. Hooray for him, a friend of the taxpayers. Why were these 4th Graders, Chris, Peter and Marie brought into this discussion in the first place to read scripted materials? For emotional effect?? It was very good marketing & PR for a very small special interest group or should we say business?? Nobody is critiquing this child day care or its quality or not serving a good purpose for a few families in Bow that it serves. What would happen if 100 families in Bow applied for this day care/”pre-school”? Would the Town then be responsible for expanding this business and providing space and staff?? I also understand that this day care accepts children from outside Bow? Why is it that the Bow taxpayers have to be responsible for this in the Town budget? That is the real $80,000 plus question here! If I started a recreation based business (or something that closely resembles one like Celebrating Children “pre-school”), can I have rent free space in a Town building, payroll, insurance and be able to hide under the Town umbrella and my own line in the Town budget?? And maybe demand Town benefits down the road for all my employees?? And more space if I were to expand its capacity, size or scope of operation??? This is a terrible and irresponsible precedence to set for the future of the municipal budget in Bow. This business, Celebrating Children “pre-school”, belongs in private enterprise and currently most probably qualifies as a 501.c.3 non-profit operation which has many benefits including being able to apply for grants and take tax deductible contributions if it is in fact a legitimate “pre-school”. It is about time that the Board of Selectmen shows some leadership abilities for a change something that has been lacking for many years in Bow. Socialism is the practice of public collective ownership for the purpose of operating for use rather than for profit.
January 20, 2008 3:04 PM
 

Fight4Bow said:

Just like in the presidential race the politics of division are front and center in our little town of Bow. Last week NH voters were called bigots because the poll numbers didn’t match the primary results. This week, a Bow mother, used the “R” word against a selectman who she didn’t agree with. In a letter to the letter, this mother openly admitted that she encouraged her young children to give speeches that were partially prepared by herself. Based on this new admitted information, the concern for kids being used for political purposes is very legitimate. The charge of racism is clearly not. What kind of example is this mother setting for her children? Should the rest of Bow make false charges against their neighbor? I think all of Bow knows that the charge of racism is just a punishment to one selectmen who was looking for ways to cut spending. It is just like the shutting off the street lights was a punishment for cutting the budget. It is interesting the common factor in this type of politics is politician Harry Judd.
January 21, 2008 7:54 AM
 

Offended said:

Mr. Judd was not even at the meeting we are all talking about--- he was out of town as he is for a majority of the selectman's meetings-- he uses the phone in method of attending meeting and has gotten away with this for way too long. If you can not attend a meeting you should not be on the board! Offended by his lack of participation.
January 21, 2008 5:14 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

This Blog







  Print This Page  |  Email This Page  |  Make Us Your Homepage!
User Agreement  |  Privacy Policy  |  © 2006 The Union Leader Corporation  |  Powered by SilverTech