<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bedford Bulletin : Citizen Petitions</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Citizen+Petitions/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Citizen Petitions</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>Bedford residents divided on two road bonds</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2008/02/27/Bedford-residents-divided-on-two-road-bonds.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:7324</guid><dc:creator>Bedford Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/comments/7324.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7324</wfw:commentRss><description>BY STEPHEN BEALE Supporters of two different road bonds agreed on only one thing at a hearing last Monday &amp;ndash; nothing less than the safety of drivers is at stake in the outcome. One $12 million bond has been placed on the March ballot through a citizen...(&lt;a href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2008/02/27/Bedford-residents-divided-on-two-road-bonds.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7324" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Bedford/default.aspx">Bedford</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Citizen+Petitions/default.aspx">Citizen Petitions</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Voting/default.aspx">Voting</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Road+work/default.aspx">Road work</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/bonds/default.aspx">bonds</category></item><item><title>Tinker Road resident wants one-way street</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/04/18/Tinker-Road-resident-wants-one_2D00_way-street.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:2311</guid><dc:creator>Bedford Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/comments/2311.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2311</wfw:commentRss><description>BY KEVIN SHALVEY During the past 15 years, Bernie Ruchin hasn&amp;rsquo;t opened his windows facing Tinker Road because of the dust flying off the road. &amp;ldquo;We don&amp;rsquo;t even use the front door anymore because of that dust,&amp;rdquo; he said. He&amp;rsquo;s...(&lt;a href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/04/18/Tinker-Road-resident-wants-one_2D00_way-street.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2311" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Bedford/default.aspx">Bedford</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Citizen+Petitions/default.aspx">Citizen Petitions</category></item><item><title>Wetland abutters to be protected</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/03/15/Wetland-abutters-to-be-protected.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:1933</guid><dc:creator>Bedford Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/comments/1933.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1933</wfw:commentRss><description>BY KEVIN SHALVEY Residents who own property that abuts town wetlands will be exempt from future buffers and wetland regulations. Voters passed citizen-petitioned zoning Amendment 7 with a 1,836-1,220 vote. &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m very pleased that it passed....(&lt;a href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/03/15/Wetland-abutters-to-be-protected.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1933" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Bedford/default.aspx">Bedford</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/wetlands/default.aspx">wetlands</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Citizen+Petitions/default.aspx">Citizen Petitions</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Voting/default.aspx">Voting</category></item><item><title>Taking charge - Residents bring three petitioned zoning articles to voters</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/03/08/Taking-charge-_2D00_-Residents-bring-three-petitioned-zoning-articles-to-voters.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:1844</guid><dc:creator>Bedford Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/comments/1844.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1844</wfw:commentRss><description>BY KEVIN SHALVEY Three citizen petitioned amendments -- none of which are recommended by the planning board -- top off the 2007 town zoning warrant that will go before voters March 13. Bedford voters will decide whether a certain type of senior housing...(&lt;a href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/03/08/Taking-charge-_2D00_-Residents-bring-three-petitioned-zoning-articles-to-voters.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1844" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Merrimack+Valley/default.aspx">Merrimack Valley</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Bedford/default.aspx">Bedford</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/elections/default.aspx">elections</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Citizen+Petitions/default.aspx">Citizen Petitions</category></item><item><title>No nod - Zoners reject three citizen petitioned articles</title><link>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/01/25/No-nod-_2D00_-Zoners-reject-three-citizen-petitioned-articles.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7b375189-dcc7-4af7-b4d3-2fc751a0220e:1365</guid><dc:creator>Bedford Editor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/comments/1365.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1365</wfw:commentRss><description>BY KEVIN SHALVEY The planning board voted not to endorse three citizen petitioned amendments to the Bedford zoning ordinance. The three amendments, Articles 6, 7 and 8, will appear on the town ballot in March, stating the planning board does not recommend...(&lt;a href="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/2007/01/25/No-nod-_2D00_-Zoners-reject-three-citizen-petitioned-articles.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://cs.newhampshire.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1365" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Bedford/default.aspx">Bedford</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Citizen+Petitions/default.aspx">Citizen Petitions</category><category domain="http://cs.newhampshire.com/blogs/bedford_editor/archive/tags/Voting/default.aspx">Voting</category></item></channel></rss>