NewHampshire.com logo   Search NewHampshire.com The homepage for New Hampshire
NewHampshire.com Discounts
Welcome to NewHampshire.com Communities Sign in | Join | Help

Bedford Bulletin

News and Information for the Town of Bedford

Leash law passed in Bedford

BY JILLIAN JORGENSEN

The Bedford Town Council voted to establish a leash law on July 22, despite resistance from numerous dog owners who spoke during a public hearing.

The law, which goes into effect in September, passed by a single vote, 4-3. Chris Bandazian, Bob Young and Michael Scanlon voted against it. Young had suggested a law that take more time before going into effect, while Bandazian suggested a period of “strict enforcement” of current laws – such as cleaning up after dogs and keeping them in control – to see if the problems raised by those in favor of the law would be solved.

“I didn’t support to have this public hearing because, quite frankly, I do not support the leash law,” Scanlon said. He echoed sentiments heard during the hearing, such as, “It’s not the dogs’ rights, it’s the owners’ rights,” at stake. The discussion focused on Benedictine Park, which many said had become a popular defacto dog park. Bedford has no specifically designated dog park.

Peter Clemons said he knew his dog paid no taxes, but he did.

“I know my dog has no rights,” he said. “This is about the rights of the dog owners.” He said he uses few of the services his tax dollars pay for. “I do pay for that park. I pay for the high school and the elementary school despite (the fact) that I have no children that I send to them,” he said. “This is the one park that I use. Why should I be removed because somebody doesn’t want me to use it?”

But Joleen Worden said her elderly mother was almost knocked down by a loose dog.

“One, one incident where someone is badly hurt is too many,” she said, adding that many minor incidents such as her mother’s were unreported. “Don’t tell me that hundreds of incidents aren’t occurring in this town.”

Jim Scanlon had planned to bring his dog into the hearing, but was barred from doing so out of concern about allergies.

He argued that there were 3,422 registered dogs in the town, and that the council should not rush to make a decision in “the dog days of summer” when they might not all be available to speak up.

“This is a very controversial issue with emotions on both sides,” he said. But adding a dog park to the town, so dogs could run free in a fenced and designated area, might mitigate the situation.

Police Chief David C. Bailey said the department would continue to monitor the situation in the park with or without a leash law, but that it would make enforcement easier.

“When a dog is off a leash and it bites somebody, the only time we can do something is after the fact,” he said.

Jennifer Craig, and her daughter Isabella, 9, were happy about the vote, saying dogs in the park are not under the control of their owners. Isabella said that dogs had bothered her in the past when she was flying kites at the park. “They were running everywhere, running at us, growling,” she said.

Jennifer Craig said she walks her own dog – a Doberman – at Benedictine Park. “Always on a leash,” she said.

After the vote, Clemons, said he felt let down. “I’m beyond disappointed,” he said.

He said he thought many dog owners would stop going to the park – he said he would – and he thought the park would face more trouble with fewer adult, responsible eyes there. “The condoms in the parking lot were not left by dogs,” he said.

Published Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:05 PM by Bedford Editor

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

DG said:

This is the most disappointing news I have heard from The Town Of Bedford since the Bedford High School. I have been to the park several times and not once have I seen bad behavior from any of the dogs. Owners have them under control at all times. Even while teens are playing sports at one end of the field the dogs don't go near them at all. In fact the kids come up to the dogs and pat them. I can see the owners in the park walking their dogs on a leash. Right ! Next JOKE..Come on now they are there to exercise..It's like a Social gathering. We Are Tax Payers and should have the right to have a place to take our dogs. You should pay closer attention to the damage that I have seen which is the Town Of Bedford property , condoms, and left over Pot being found on the property. If that's what you want going on there..It will be going to the dogs for sure.
July 30, 2009 10:26 PM
 

John G. said:

This is absolutely rediculous... The One and only park in Bedford that dogs were somewhat allowed to go to and now this. This town has gotten progressively worse each year...very dog unfriendly. I commend Chris Bandazian, Bob Young and Michael Scanlon for voting against it and seeing that there was not a need for a leash law in Bedford. I know that when the next Town Council vote is up again, I and I am sure others will keep in mind who voted for this to be passed and considering there are 3,422 registered dogs in town currently I am sure the voter turn out will be great. I watched this meeting and one of the Council members had stated that he was a dog owner and had a large fence put up in his yard so that his dog could run and socialize. "Socializing a Dog" is not having him run around in circles within a fence. It is when they play and interact with other dogs.... So what do people that have dogs who live in apartments do?? We all cannot be so lucky to have a fenced in yard. It all comes down to selfishness and common sense. People that don't like dogs or have kids why couldn't they have simply just gone to one of the several other parks that are available to eveyone except dogs. I am sure it was because the park was convenient (This is where selfishness comes in) to them, well dog owners do not/did not have that luxury. Common Sense is pretty much the same thing, if you are afraid of dogs, have allergies or simply don't want to be around dogs. Then don't...go enjoy one of the several other parks that you have a choice to use. And if you have kids I would take them to a park geared towards kids, I am sure they would have more fun there anyhow. Everytime I went to the park with my dog humans as well as dogs all got along. It is a shame because of a few people that this law had to pass. As far as the "supposed" dog park, I know the dog park committe is working hard despite the setbacks between the Land Trust and Town not being on the same page. I am sure there are going to be way more critical accidents regarding people being hit walking their dogs (since we don't have sidewalks) than the few incidents at the park. But, the town should definitely spend money from the Parks and Recreation funds for a Common with a bandstand though which will be used only a few months out of the year. SO RIDICULOUS!! It is what it is, yet another reason to move out of Bedford... I am still wondering why the Town has all these meeting and the majority of the people voice their opinion and are against and yet they still vote for the minority.... Joe From Not-so Dog Friendly Bedford P.S. There should be plenty of room for kites to be flown now without any distractions, since I am sure the park will not be used much at all anymore, What a waste...
August 1, 2009 12:13 AM
 

NS said:

Evidently many Bedford dog owners need a reality check. Not everyone loves (or even likes) dogs. Having owners keep the dogs on a leash is not an unreasonable requirement. The parks are for people - not animals. Oddly many of these people equate dogs with people - but that's a point for another discussion. Paying taxes DOES NOT give one the right to do as he/she pleases on public property. Where would it end? Heck - I pay taxes - I'll just set up my RV in the park! Pointing out other park issues is an exercise in apples and oranges. It's irrelevant. When I go to the park, I don't want to deal with your slobbering pet or the urine it left on the ground. You don't pick THAT up do you? I don't think your animal is cute, amusing,or interesting. I don't think it's charming when it charges up to my children and licks them. And for those whining that it's not fair that the law is only in parks I say fine - let the whole town put a leash law into effect. Stop whining and get your leashes out. Build a park for your beasts for all I care - but leave the human beings alone.
August 1, 2009 12:46 PM
 

mo baxter said:

Leash Law is good thing for all dogs and other animals. I was NH already have a leash law. But dogs do need a place to run as lond as it fence in.
August 9, 2009 9:55 PM
 

DB said:

I'm glad this passed, I have a dog and have used the park many times. I enjoyed it at first, but I ended up not going after several problems with VERY aggressive dogs and owners that were not paying attention. Two owners in particular were not to be trusted for watching after their dogs. They would allow their dogs to become very very aggressive with other dogs and look the other way. Not good - way to go Bedford, I agree with this decision. How about an actual supervised dog park??
August 15, 2009 9:56 PM
 

DG said:

What a time to pass this law in the middle of summer when most people are on vacation.....This needs to be voted on in March...You know a fenced in Doggy Park isn't doing to happen.... Where I would like to know....Studies have been done in the past on available Town land for a fenced in Park and came up with nothing..So who's going to pull it out of they hat this time ?????
September 2, 2009 11:24 PM
 

MB said:

I'm glad this leash law passed, I wish it would become state law! I was attacked by 3 loose dogs on a trail in Bedford that is on the Manchester town line in back of St. Joseph's Cemetery. I suffered numerous broken bones and subsequent surgery. After 6 months, I am still out of work. The dog owner told me he didn't need any leashes on his dogs because he was in Bedford. He had a total of 4 loose dogs with him and absolutely no leash to contain them. He took off into the woods (chasing the loose dogs) and the police could not locate him. I've lost almost 6 months pay not to mention the pain I've suffered. The Bedford Bulletin reported my story with the wrong breed of dog. Someone in Bedford was kind enough to offer a reward for finding this dog owner but since I never saw the article and the error, nobody responded. I believe the breed of dogs that attacked me and my dog were border collie mixes. One dog had a black face with a white line down it face and gray mottling across its nose. One younger puppy was orange and white coloring and one puppy was black and white coloring. The owner was breeding the older dogs. This incident was not well known except for the town counsel. I'm sure it helped lead to the enactment of a leash law. Nobody should have to endure the pain I have because of an irresponsible dog owner, so the alternative to these events re-occurring is to enact a leash law. To John G: Selfishness is when a dog owner is oblivious to the safety of all people...all dogs have unpredictable moment and can jump, bite, etc.....
September 21, 2009 11:04 AM
 

BillF said:

I'm sorry that you were injured MB, but it wasn't the dogs that caused your injury. It was the owner of that group of menaces. When I was initially selected to sit on Parks and Rec, that then-group of Town Councilors, to a man, told me that P+R wasn't just about placating the adults that run the kids leagues. We had just as big a responsibility to all passive uses of town property too. That includes reasonable accommodation for everyone. To me, that makes perfect sense. The current P+R board, inexplicably, voted unanimously to support a leash ordinance, this year, when last year, we voted unanimously to not recommend a leash law. If the Police Chief could claim it was a public safety hazard to have unleashed dogs in town, we'd have supported it back then. Then, as this year, he has never said that. Councilor Bandazian and Councilor Scanlon both advocated some kind of increased police enforcement of the current laws on the books with regard to controlling your pets. I don't understand why Councilor Young voted against the leash law. His reason didn't make sense. The other four Town Councilors voted for a leash law for town parks and property, but not one for the streets or roving dogs on private property. In essence, you can't have an unleashed dog on town property, but you, theoretically, could have roving packs of dogs throughout Town. In that case, you'd need increased enforcement, Town-wide, which is what Councilors Bandazian and Scanlon supported. I can't speak for the police, but I can make a recommendation to you. If you feel threatened by anyone's dog, anywhere, don't get into a legal argument with any owner(s) over what ordinances apply, get out your cell phone and call the police. If you see dogs in the distance that make you uncomfortable, call the police. That's their job, to protect and serve. Do you think that if you had called the police the second that you saw that scrum coming over the hill in the cemetery, while you yelled "I'm calling the police," that you might have avoided injury? It might have helped. I would argue that this leash law has cheesed off many responsible tax paying dog owners in Town, for no reason other than P+R and the Town Council majority got it wrong. If you don't like what your citizen representation is doing on the Commissions, complain to them. Same goes for the Town Council. Again. I'm sorry you were hurt, but this leash law is a 'baby out with the bathwater' solution.
October 3, 2009 10:54 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

This Blog


  Print This Page  |  Email This Page  |  Make Us Your Homepage!
User Agreement  |  Privacy Policy  |  © 2006 The Union Leader Corporation  |  Powered by SilverTech